提交 762eb67b 编写于 作者: V Vivien Didelot 提交者: David S. Miller

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: fix circular lock in PPU work

Lock debugging shows that there is a possible circular lock in the PPU
work code. Switch the lock order of smi_mutex and ppu_mutex to fix this.

Here's the full trace:

    [    4.341325] ======================================================
    [    4.347519] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
    [    4.353800] 4.6.0 #4 Not tainted
    [    4.357039] -------------------------------------------------------
    [    4.363315] kworker/0:1/328 is trying to acquire lock:
    [    4.368463]  (&ps->smi_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<8049c758>] mv88e6xxx_reg_read+0x30/0x54
    [    4.376313]
    [    4.376313] but task is already holding lock:
    [    4.382160]  (&ps->ppu_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<8049cac0>] mv88e6xxx_ppu_reenable_work+0x28/0xd4
    [    4.390772]
    [    4.390772] which lock already depends on the new lock.
    [    4.390772]
    [    4.398963]
    [    4.398963] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
    [    4.406461]
    [    4.406461] -> #1 (&ps->ppu_mutex){+.+...}:
    [    4.410897]        [<806d86bc>] mutex_lock_nested+0x54/0x360
    [    4.416606]        [<8049a800>] mv88e6xxx_ppu_access_get+0x28/0x100
    [    4.422906]        [<8049b778>] mv88e6xxx_phy_read+0x90/0xdc
    [    4.428599]        [<806a4534>] dsa_slave_phy_read+0x3c/0x40
    [    4.434300]        [<804943ec>] mdiobus_read+0x68/0x80
    [    4.439481]        [<804939d4>] get_phy_device+0x58/0x1d8
    [    4.444914]        [<80493ed0>] mdiobus_scan+0x24/0xf4
    [    4.450078]        [<8049409c>] __mdiobus_register+0xfc/0x1ac
    [    4.455857]        [<806a40b0>] dsa_probe+0x860/0xca8
    [    4.460934]        [<8043246c>] platform_drv_probe+0x5c/0xc0
    [    4.466627]        [<804305a0>] driver_probe_device+0x118/0x450
    [    4.472589]        [<80430b00>] __device_attach_driver+0xac/0x128
    [    4.478724]        [<8042e350>] bus_for_each_drv+0x74/0xa8
    [    4.484235]        [<804302d8>] __device_attach+0xc4/0x154
    [    4.489755]        [<80430cec>] device_initial_probe+0x1c/0x20
    [    4.495612]        [<8042f620>] bus_probe_device+0x98/0xa0
    [    4.501123]        [<8042fbd0>] deferred_probe_work_func+0x4c/0xd4
    [    4.507328]        [<8013a794>] process_one_work+0x1a8/0x604
    [    4.513030]        [<8013ac54>] worker_thread+0x64/0x528
    [    4.518367]        [<801409e8>] kthread+0xec/0x100
    [    4.523201]        [<80108f30>] ret_from_fork+0x14/0x24
    [    4.528462]
    [    4.528462] -> #0 (&ps->smi_mutex){+.+.+.}:
    [    4.532895]        [<8015ad5c>] lock_acquire+0xb4/0x1dc
    [    4.538154]        [<806d86bc>] mutex_lock_nested+0x54/0x360
    [    4.543856]        [<8049c758>] mv88e6xxx_reg_read+0x30/0x54
    [    4.549549]        [<8049cad8>] mv88e6xxx_ppu_reenable_work+0x40/0xd4
    [    4.556022]        [<8013a794>] process_one_work+0x1a8/0x604
    [    4.561707]        [<8013ac54>] worker_thread+0x64/0x528
    [    4.567053]        [<801409e8>] kthread+0xec/0x100
    [    4.571878]        [<80108f30>] ret_from_fork+0x14/0x24
    [    4.577139]
    [    4.577139] other info that might help us debug this:
    [    4.577139]
    [    4.585159]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
    [    4.585159]
    [    4.591093]        CPU0                    CPU1
    [    4.595631]        ----                    ----
    [    4.600169]   lock(&ps->ppu_mutex);
    [    4.603693]                                lock(&ps->smi_mutex);
    [    4.609742]                                lock(&ps->ppu_mutex);
    [    4.615790]   lock(&ps->smi_mutex);
    [    4.619314]
    [    4.619314]  *** DEADLOCK ***
    [    4.619314]
    [    4.625256] 3 locks held by kworker/0:1/328:
    [    4.629537]  #0:  ("events"){.+.+..}, at: [<8013a704>] process_one_work+0x118/0x604
    [    4.637288]  #1:  ((&ps->ppu_work)){+.+...}, at: [<8013a704>] process_one_work+0x118/0x604
    [    4.645653]  #2:  (&ps->ppu_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<8049cac0>] mv88e6xxx_ppu_reenable_work+0x28/0xd4
    [    4.654714]
    [    4.654714] stack backtrace:
    [    4.659098] CPU: 0 PID: 328 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 4.6.0 #4
    [    4.665286] Hardware name: Freescale Vybrid VF5xx/VF6xx (Device Tree)
    [    4.671748] Workqueue: events mv88e6xxx_ppu_reenable_work
    [    4.677174] Backtrace:
    [    4.679674] [<8010d354>] (dump_backtrace) from [<8010d5a0>] (show_stack+0x20/0x24)
    [    4.687252]  r6:80fb3c88 r5:80fb3c88 r4:80fb4728 r3:00000002
    [    4.693003] [<8010d580>] (show_stack) from [<803b45e8>] (dump_stack+0x24/0x28)
    [    4.700246] [<803b45c4>] (dump_stack) from [<80157398>] (print_circular_bug+0x208/0x32c)
    [    4.708361] [<80157190>] (print_circular_bug) from [<8015a630>] (__lock_acquire+0x185c/0x1b80)
    [    4.716982]  r10:9ec22a00 r9:00000060 r8:8164b6bc r7:00000040 r6:00000003 r5:8163a5b4
    [    4.724905]  r4:00000003 r3:9ec22de8
    [    4.728537] [<80158dd4>] (__lock_acquire) from [<8015ad5c>] (lock_acquire+0xb4/0x1dc)
    [    4.736378]  r10:60000013 r9:00000000 r8:00000000 r7:00000000 r6:9e5e9c50 r5:80e618e0
    [    4.744301]  r4:00000000
    [    4.746879] [<8015aca8>] (lock_acquire) from [<806d86bc>] (mutex_lock_nested+0x54/0x360)
    [    4.754976]  r10:9e5e9c1c r9:80e616c4 r8:9f685ea0 r7:0000001b r6:9ec22a00 r5:8163a5b4
    [    4.762899]  r4:9e5e9c1c
    [    4.765477] [<806d8668>] (mutex_lock_nested) from [<8049c758>] (mv88e6xxx_reg_read+0x30/0x54)
    [    4.774008]  r10:80e60c5b r9:80e616c4 r8:9f685ea0 r7:0000001b r6:00000004 r5:9e5e9c10
    [    4.781930]  r4:9e5e9c1c
    [    4.784507] [<8049c728>] (mv88e6xxx_reg_read) from [<8049cad8>] (mv88e6xxx_ppu_reenable_work+0x40/0xd4)
    [    4.793907]  r7:9ffd5400 r6:9e5e9c68 r5:9e5e9cb0 r4:9e5e9c10
    [    4.799659] [<8049ca98>] (mv88e6xxx_ppu_reenable_work) from [<8013a794>] (process_one_work+0x1a8/0x604)
    [    4.809059]  r9:80e616c4 r8:9f685ea0 r7:9ffd5400 r6:80e0a1c8 r5:9f5f2e80 r4:9e5e9cb0
    [    4.816910] [<8013a5ec>] (process_one_work) from [<8013ac54>] (worker_thread+0x64/0x528)
    [    4.825010]  r10:9f5f2e80 r9:00000008 r8:80e0dc80 r7:80e0a1fc r6:80e0a1c8 r5:9f5f2e98
    [    4.832933]  r4:80e0a1c8
    [    4.835510] [<8013abf0>] (worker_thread) from [<801409e8>] (kthread+0xec/0x100)
    [    4.842827]  r10:00000000 r9:00000000 r8:00000000 r7:8013abf0 r6:9f5f2e80 r5:9ec15740
    [    4.850749]  r4:00000000
    [    4.853327] [<801408fc>] (kthread) from [<80108f30>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x24)
    [    4.860557]  r7:00000000 r6:00000000 r5:801408fc r4:9ec15740
Signed-off-by: NVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NVivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
上级 0e576044
......@@ -288,18 +288,18 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_ppu_enable(struct mv88e6xxx_priv_state *ps)
int ret, err;
unsigned long timeout;
ret = mv88e6xxx_reg_read(ps, REG_GLOBAL, GLOBAL_CONTROL);
ret = _mv88e6xxx_reg_read(ps, REG_GLOBAL, GLOBAL_CONTROL);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
err = mv88e6xxx_reg_write(ps, REG_GLOBAL, GLOBAL_CONTROL,
ret | GLOBAL_CONTROL_PPU_ENABLE);
err = _mv88e6xxx_reg_write(ps, REG_GLOBAL, GLOBAL_CONTROL,
ret | GLOBAL_CONTROL_PPU_ENABLE);
if (err)
return err;
timeout = jiffies + 1 * HZ;
while (time_before(jiffies, timeout)) {
ret = mv88e6xxx_reg_read(ps, REG_GLOBAL, GLOBAL_STATUS);
ret = _mv88e6xxx_reg_read(ps, REG_GLOBAL, GLOBAL_STATUS);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
......@@ -317,11 +317,16 @@ static void mv88e6xxx_ppu_reenable_work(struct work_struct *ugly)
struct mv88e6xxx_priv_state *ps;
ps = container_of(ugly, struct mv88e6xxx_priv_state, ppu_work);
mutex_lock(&ps->smi_mutex);
if (mutex_trylock(&ps->ppu_mutex)) {
if (mv88e6xxx_ppu_enable(ps) == 0)
ps->ppu_disabled = 0;
mutex_unlock(&ps->ppu_mutex);
}
mutex_unlock(&ps->smi_mutex);
}
static void mv88e6xxx_ppu_reenable_timer(unsigned long _ps)
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册