提交 7613f5fe 编写于 作者: D Daniel Borkmann 提交者: David S. Miller

net: sctp: sctp_verify_init: clean up mandatory checks and add comment

Add a comment related to RFC4960 explaning why we do not check for initial
TSN, and while at it, remove yoda notation checks and clean up code from
checks of mandatory conditions. That's probably just really minor, but makes
reviewing easier.
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NNeil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
上级 95bd09eb
...@@ -2240,25 +2240,23 @@ int sctp_verify_init(struct net *net, const struct sctp_association *asoc, ...@@ -2240,25 +2240,23 @@ int sctp_verify_init(struct net *net, const struct sctp_association *asoc,
struct sctp_chunk **errp) struct sctp_chunk **errp)
{ {
union sctp_params param; union sctp_params param;
int has_cookie = 0; bool has_cookie = false;
int result; int result;
/* Verify stream values are non-zero. */ /* Check for missing mandatory parameters. Note: Initial TSN is
if ((0 == peer_init->init_hdr.num_outbound_streams) || * also mandatory, but is not checked here since the valid range
(0 == peer_init->init_hdr.num_inbound_streams) || * is 0..2**32-1. RFC4960, section 3.3.3.
(0 == peer_init->init_hdr.init_tag) || */
(SCTP_DEFAULT_MINWINDOW > ntohl(peer_init->init_hdr.a_rwnd))) { if (peer_init->init_hdr.num_outbound_streams == 0 ||
peer_init->init_hdr.num_inbound_streams == 0 ||
peer_init->init_hdr.init_tag == 0 ||
ntohl(peer_init->init_hdr.a_rwnd) < SCTP_DEFAULT_MINWINDOW)
return sctp_process_inv_mandatory(asoc, chunk, errp); return sctp_process_inv_mandatory(asoc, chunk, errp);
}
/* Check for missing mandatory parameters. */
sctp_walk_params(param, peer_init, init_hdr.params) { sctp_walk_params(param, peer_init, init_hdr.params) {
if (param.p->type == SCTP_PARAM_STATE_COOKIE)
if (SCTP_PARAM_STATE_COOKIE == param.p->type) has_cookie = true;
has_cookie = 1; }
} /* for (loop through all parameters) */
/* There is a possibility that a parameter length was bad and /* There is a possibility that a parameter length was bad and
* in that case we would have stoped walking the parameters. * in that case we would have stoped walking the parameters.
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册