bpf: Allow narrow loads of bpf_sysctl fields with offset > 0

"ctx:file_pos sysctl:read read ok narrow" works on s390 by accident: it
reads the wrong byte, which happens to have the expected value of 0.
Improve the test by seeking to the 4th byte and expecting 4 instead of
0.

This makes the latent problem apparent: the test attempts to read the
first byte of bpf_sysctl.file_pos, assuming this is the least-significant
byte, which is not the case on big-endian machines: a non-zero offset is
needed.

The point of the test is to verify narrow loads, so we cannot cheat our
way out by simply using BPF_W. The existence of the test means that such
loads have to be supported, most likely because llvm can generate them.
Fix the test by adding a big-endian variant, which uses an offset to
access the least-significant byte of bpf_sysctl.file_pos.

This reveals the final problem: verifier rejects accesses to bpf_sysctl
fields with offset > 0. Such accesses are already allowed for a wide
range of structs: __sk_buff, bpf_sock_addr and sk_msg_md to name a few.
Extend this support to bpf_sysctl by using bpf_ctx_range instead of
offsetof when matching field offsets.

Fixes: 7b146ceb ("bpf: Sysctl hook")
Fixes: e1550bfe ("bpf: Add file_pos field to bpf_sysctl ctx")
Fixes: 9a1027e5 ("selftests/bpf: Test file_pos field in bpf_sysctl ctx")
Signed-off-by: NIlya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NAndrey Ignatov <rdna@fb.com>
Acked-by: NAndrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191028122902.9763-1-iii@linux.ibm.com

kernel/bpf/cgroup.c

@@ -1311,12 +1311,12 @@ static bool sysctl_is_valid_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type,
 		return false;
 
 	switch (off) {
-	case offsetof(struct bpf_sysctl, write):
+	case bpf_ctx_range(struct bpf_sysctl, write):
 		if (type != BPF_READ)
 			return false;
 		bpf_ctx_record_field_size(info, size_default);
 		return bpf_ctx_narrow_access_ok(off, size, size_default);
-	case offsetof(struct bpf_sysctl, file_pos):
+	case bpf_ctx_range(struct bpf_sysctl, file_pos):
 		if (type == BPF_READ) {
 			bpf_ctx_record_field_size(info, size_default);
 			return bpf_ctx_narrow_access_ok(off, size, size_default);

tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sysctl.c

@@ -161,9 +161,14 @@ static struct sysctl_test tests[] = {
 		.descr = "ctx:file_pos sysctl:read read ok narrow",
 		.insns = {
 			/* If (file_pos == X) */
+#if __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN
 			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_1,
 				    offsetof(struct bpf_sysctl, file_pos)),
-			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_7, 0, 2),
+#else
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct bpf_sysctl, file_pos) + 3),
+#endif
+			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_7, 4, 2),
 
 			/* return ALLOW; */
 			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
@@ -176,6 +181,7 @@ static struct sysctl_test tests[] = {
 		.attach_type = BPF_CGROUP_SYSCTL,
 		.sysctl = "kernel/ostype",
 		.open_flags = O_RDONLY,
+		.seek = 4,
 		.result = SUCCESS,
 	},
 	{