提交 74e919d2 编写于 作者: J Johannes Berg 提交者: Richard Weinberger

um: virtio: clean up a comment

There's no 'simtime' device, because implementing that through
virtio was just too much complexity. Clean up the comment that
still refers to it.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
上级 92bf2261
...@@ -914,8 +914,7 @@ static struct virtqueue *vu_setup_vq(struct virtio_device *vdev, ...@@ -914,8 +914,7 @@ static struct virtqueue *vu_setup_vq(struct virtio_device *vdev,
#ifdef CONFIG_UML_TIME_TRAVEL_SUPPORT #ifdef CONFIG_UML_TIME_TRAVEL_SUPPORT
/* /*
* When we get an interrupt, we must bounce it through the simulation * When we get an interrupt, we must bounce it through the simulation
* calendar (the simtime device), except for the simtime device itself * calendar (the time-travel=ext:... socket).
* since that's part of the simulation control.
*/ */
if (time_travel_mode == TT_MODE_EXTERNAL && callback) { if (time_travel_mode == TT_MODE_EXTERNAL && callback) {
info->callback = callback; info->callback = callback;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册