sparc64: Fix find_node warning if numa node cannot be found
When booting up LDOM, find_node() warns that a physical address doesn't match a NUMA node. WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c:835 find_node+0xf4/0x120 find_node: A physical address doesn't match a NUMA node rule. Some physical memory will be owned by node 0.Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 4.9.0-rc3 #4 Call Trace: [0000000000468ba0] __warn+0xc0/0xe0 [0000000000468c74] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x34/0x60 [00000000004592f4] find_node+0xf4/0x120 [0000000000dd0774] add_node_ranges+0x38/0xe4 [0000000000dd0b1c] numa_parse_mdesc+0x268/0x2e4 [0000000000dd0e9c] bootmem_init+0xb8/0x160 [0000000000dd174c] paging_init+0x808/0x8fc [0000000000dcb0d0] setup_arch+0x2c8/0x2f0 [0000000000dc68a0] start_kernel+0x48/0x424 [0000000000dcb374] start_early_boot+0x27c/0x28c [0000000000a32c08] tlb_fixup_done+0x4c/0x64 [0000000000027f08] 0x27f08 It is because linux use an internal structure node_masks[] to keep the best memory latency node only. However, LDOM mdesc can contain single latency-group with multiple memory latency nodes. If the address doesn't match the best latency node within node_masks[], it should check for an alternative via mdesc. The warning message should only be printed if the address doesn't match any node_masks[] nor within mdesc. To minimize the impact of searching mdesc every time, the last matched mask and index is stored in a variable. Signed-off-by: NThomas Tai <thomas.tai@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NChris Hyser <chris.hyser@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NLiam Merwick <liam.merwick@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录