提交 70691d4a 编写于 作者: A Andreea-Cristina Bernat 提交者: Ingo Molnar

perf/core: Replace rcu_assign_pointer() with RCU_INIT_POINTER()

The use of "rcu_assign_pointer()" is NULLing out the pointer.
According to RCU_INIT_POINTER()'s block comment:

  "1.   This use of RCU_INIT_POINTER() is NULLing out the pointer"

it is better to use it instead of rcu_assign_pointer() because it has a
smaller overhead.

The following Coccinelle semantic patch was used:
  @@
  @@

  - rcu_assign_pointer
  + RCU_INIT_POINTER
    (..., NULL)
Signed-off-by: NAndreea-Cristina Bernat <bernat.ada@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140822132605.GA20130@adaSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
上级 e0455e19
......@@ -5908,7 +5908,7 @@ static void swevent_hlist_release(struct swevent_htable *swhash)
if (!hlist)
return;
rcu_assign_pointer(swhash->swevent_hlist, NULL);
RCU_INIT_POINTER(swhash->swevent_hlist, NULL);
kfree_rcu(hlist, rcu_head);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册