提交 6ea69931 编写于 作者: P Petr Machata 提交者: Zheng Zengkai

net: dcb: Accept RTM_GETDCB messages carrying set-like DCB commands

stable inclusion
from stable-5.10.10
commit 1e5a4c74b555e9b41236f406e2a43b0534af029c
bugzilla: 47610

--------------------------------

[ Upstream commit df85bc14 ]

In commit 826f328e ("net: dcb: Validate netlink message in DCB
handler"), Linux started rejecting RTM_GETDCB netlink messages if they
contained a set-like DCB_CMD_ command.

The reason was that privileges were only verified for RTM_SETDCB messages,
but the value that determined the action to be taken is the command, not
the message type. And validation of message type against the DCB command
was the obvious missing piece.

Unfortunately it turns out that mlnx_qos, a somewhat widely deployed tool
for configuration of DCB, accesses the DCB set-like APIs through
RTM_GETDCB.

Therefore do not bounce the discrepancy between message type and command.
Instead, in addition to validating privileges based on the actual message
type, validate them also based on the expected message type. This closes
the loophole of allowing DCB configuration on non-admin accounts, while
maintaining backward compatibility.

Fixes: 2f90b865 ("ixgbe: this patch adds support for DCB to the kernel and ixgbe driver")
Fixes: 826f328e ("net: dcb: Validate netlink message in DCB handler")
Signed-off-by: NPetr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/a3edcfda0825f2aa2591801c5232f2bbf2d8a554.1610384801.git.me@pmachata.orgSigned-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NZheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>
Acked-by: NXie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
上级 80cbc59d
......@@ -1765,7 +1765,7 @@ static int dcb_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
fn = &reply_funcs[dcb->cmd];
if (!fn->cb)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
if (fn->type != nlh->nlmsg_type)
if (fn->type == RTM_SETDCB && !netlink_capable(skb, CAP_NET_ADMIN))
return -EPERM;
if (!tb[DCB_ATTR_IFNAME])
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册