提交 6df84693 编写于 作者: D Dust Li 提交者: Zheng Zengkai

net/smc: fix wrong list_del in smc_lgr_cleanup_early

stable inclusion
from stable-v5.10.84
commit 77731fede297a23d26f2d169b4269466b2c82529
bugzilla: 186030 https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I4QV2F

Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=77731fede297a23d26f2d169b4269466b2c82529

--------------------------------

commit 789b6cc2 upstream.

smc_lgr_cleanup_early() meant to delete the link
group from the link group list, but it deleted
the list head by mistake.

This may cause memory corruption since we didn't
remove the real link group from the list and later
memseted the link group structure.
We got a list corruption panic when testing:

[  231.277259] list_del corruption. prev->next should be ffff8881398a8000, but was 0000000000000000
[  231.278222] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[  231.278726] kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:53!
[  231.279326] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI
[  231.279803] CPU: 0 PID: 5 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 5.10.46+ #435
[  231.280466] Hardware name: Alibaba Cloud ECS, BIOS 8c24b4c 04/01/2014
[  231.281248] Workqueue: events smc_link_down_work
[  231.281732] RIP: 0010:__list_del_entry_valid+0x70/0x90
[  231.282258] Code: 4c 60 82 e8 7d cc 6a 00 0f 0b 48 89 fe 48 c7 c7 88 4c
60 82 e8 6c cc 6a 00 0f 0b 48 89 fe 48 c7 c7 c0 4c 60 82 e8 5b cc 6a 00 <0f>
0b 48 89 fe 48 c7 c7 00 4d 60 82 e8 4a cc 6a 00 0f 0b cc cc cc
[  231.284146] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000033d58 EFLAGS: 00010292
[  231.284685] RAX: 0000000000000054 RBX: ffff8881398a8000 RCX: 0000000000000000
[  231.285415] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffff88813bc18040 RDI: ffff88813bc18040
[  231.286141] RBP: ffffffff8305ad40 R08: 0000000000000003 R09: 0000000000000001
[  231.286873] R10: ffffffff82803da0 R11: ffffc90000033b90 R12: 0000000000000001
[  231.287606] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8881398a8000 R15: 0000000000000003
[  231.288337] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88813bc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[  231.289160] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[  231.289754] CR2: 0000000000e72058 CR3: 000000010fa96006 CR4: 00000000003706f0
[  231.290485] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[  231.291211] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[  231.291940] Call Trace:
[  231.292211]  smc_lgr_terminate_sched+0x53/0xa0
[  231.292677]  smc_switch_conns+0x75/0x6b0
[  231.293085]  ? update_load_avg+0x1a6/0x590
[  231.293517]  ? ttwu_do_wakeup+0x17/0x150
[  231.293907]  ? update_load_avg+0x1a6/0x590
[  231.294317]  ? newidle_balance+0xca/0x3d0
[  231.294716]  smcr_link_down+0x50/0x1a0
[  231.295090]  ? __wake_up_common_lock+0x77/0x90
[  231.295534]  smc_link_down_work+0x46/0x60
[  231.295933]  process_one_work+0x18b/0x350

Fixes: a0a62ee1 ("net/smc: separate locks for SMCD and SMCR link group lists")
Signed-off-by: NDust Li <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com>
Acked-by: NKarsten Graul <kgraul@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NTony Lu <tonylu@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NChen Jun <chenjun102@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NZheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>
上级 4273afa5
......@@ -204,18 +204,17 @@ static void smc_lgr_unregister_conn(struct smc_connection *conn)
void smc_lgr_cleanup_early(struct smc_connection *conn)
{
struct smc_link_group *lgr = conn->lgr;
struct list_head *lgr_list;
spinlock_t *lgr_lock;
if (!lgr)
return;
smc_conn_free(conn);
lgr_list = smc_lgr_list_head(lgr, &lgr_lock);
smc_lgr_list_head(lgr, &lgr_lock);
spin_lock_bh(lgr_lock);
/* do not use this link group for new connections */
if (!list_empty(lgr_list))
list_del_init(lgr_list);
if (!list_empty(&lgr->list))
list_del_init(&lgr->list);
spin_unlock_bh(lgr_lock);
__smc_lgr_terminate(lgr, true);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册