提交 6c33ae1a 编写于 作者: J Jiafei Pan 提交者: David S. Miller

dpaa2-eth: use napi_schedule to be compatible with PREEMPT_RT

The driver calls napi_schedule_irqoff() from a context where, in RT,
hardirqs are not disabled, since the IRQ handler is force-threaded.

In the call path of this function, __raise_softirq_irqoff() is modifying
its per-CPU mask of pending softirqs that must be processed, using
or_softirq_pending(). The or_softirq_pending() function is not atomic,
but since interrupts are supposed to be disabled, nobody should be
preempting it, and the operation should be safe.

Nonetheless, when running with hardirqs on, as in the PREEMPT_RT case,
it isn't safe, and the pending softirqs mask can get corrupted,
resulting in softirqs being lost and never processed.

To have common code that works with PREEMPT_RT and with mainline Linux,
we can use plain napi_schedule() instead. The difference is that
napi_schedule() (via __napi_schedule) also calls local_irq_save, which
disables hardirqs if they aren't already. But, since they already are
disabled in non-RT, this means that in practice we don't see any
measurable difference in throughput or latency with this patch.
Signed-off-by: NJiafei Pan <Jiafei.Pan@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
上级 d8f375ea
......@@ -2330,7 +2330,7 @@ static void cdan_cb(struct dpaa2_io_notification_ctx *ctx)
/* Update NAPI statistics */
ch->stats.cdan++;
napi_schedule_irqoff(&ch->napi);
napi_schedule(&ch->napi);
}
/* Allocate and configure a DPCON object */
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册