提交 60d75865 编写于 作者: A Aleksandr Loktionov 提交者: David S. Miller

igb: fix bit_shift to be in [1..8] range

In igb_hash_mc_addr() the expression:
        "mc_addr[4] >> 8 - bit_shift", right shifting "mc_addr[4]"
shift by more than 7 bits always yields zero, so hash becomes not so different.
Add initialization with bit_shift = 1 and add a loop condition to ensure
bit_shift will be always in [1..8] range.

Fixes: 9d5c8243 ("igb: PCI-Express 82575 Gigabit Ethernet driver")
Signed-off-by: NAleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>
Tested-by: Pucha Himasekhar Reddy <himasekharx.reddy.pucha@intel.com> (A Contingent worker at Intel)
Signed-off-by: NTony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
上级 5ad3bd84
......@@ -426,7 +426,7 @@ void igb_mta_set(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 hash_value)
static u32 igb_hash_mc_addr(struct e1000_hw *hw, u8 *mc_addr)
{
u32 hash_value, hash_mask;
u8 bit_shift = 0;
u8 bit_shift = 1;
/* Register count multiplied by bits per register */
hash_mask = (hw->mac.mta_reg_count * 32) - 1;
......@@ -434,7 +434,7 @@ static u32 igb_hash_mc_addr(struct e1000_hw *hw, u8 *mc_addr)
/* For a mc_filter_type of 0, bit_shift is the number of left-shifts
* where 0xFF would still fall within the hash mask.
*/
while (hash_mask >> bit_shift != 0xFF)
while (hash_mask >> bit_shift != 0xFF && bit_shift < 4)
bit_shift++;
/* The portion of the address that is used for the hash table
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册