提交 5faf447c 编写于 作者: F Filipe Manana 提交者: Zheng Zengkai

btrfs: fix race when cloning extent buffer during rewind of an old root

stable inclusion
from stable-5.10.26
commit 38ffe9eaeb7cce383525439f0948f9eb74632e1d
bugzilla: 51363

--------------------------------

commit dbcc7d57 upstream.

While resolving backreferences, as part of a logical ino ioctl call or
fiemap, we can end up hitting a BUG_ON() when replaying tree mod log
operations of a root, triggering a stack trace like the following:

  ------------[ cut here ]------------
  kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1210!
  invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI
  CPU: 1 PID: 19054 Comm: crawl_335 Tainted: G        W         5.11.0-2d11c0084b02-misc-next+ #89
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.12.0-1 04/01/2014
  RIP: 0010:__tree_mod_log_rewind+0x3b1/0x3c0
  Code: 05 48 8d 74 10 (...)
  RSP: 0018:ffffc90001eb70b8 EFLAGS: 00010297
  RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88812344e400 RCX: ffffffffb28933b6
  RDX: 0000000000000007 RSI: dffffc0000000000 RDI: ffff88812344e42c
  RBP: ffffc90001eb7108 R08: 1ffff11020b60a20 R09: ffffed1020b60a20
  R10: ffff888105b050f9 R11: ffffed1020b60a1f R12: 00000000000000ee
  R13: ffff8880195520c0 R14: ffff8881bc958500 R15: ffff88812344e42c
  FS:  00007fd1955e8700(0000) GS:ffff8881f5600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  CR2: 00007efdb7928718 CR3: 000000010103a006 CR4: 0000000000170ee0
  Call Trace:
   btrfs_search_old_slot+0x265/0x10d0
   ? lock_acquired+0xbb/0x600
   ? btrfs_search_slot+0x1090/0x1090
   ? free_extent_buffer.part.61+0xd7/0x140
   ? free_extent_buffer+0x13/0x20
   resolve_indirect_refs+0x3e9/0xfc0
   ? lock_downgrade+0x3d0/0x3d0
   ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20
   ? add_prelim_ref.part.11+0x150/0x150
   ? lock_downgrade+0x3d0/0x3d0
   ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20
   ? lock_acquired+0xbb/0x600
   ? __kasan_check_write+0x14/0x20
   ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0xa8/0x140
   ? rb_insert_color+0x30/0x360
   ? prelim_ref_insert+0x12d/0x430
   find_parent_nodes+0x5c3/0x1830
   ? resolve_indirect_refs+0xfc0/0xfc0
   ? lock_release+0xc8/0x620
   ? fs_reclaim_acquire+0x67/0xf0
   ? lock_acquire+0xc7/0x510
   ? lock_downgrade+0x3d0/0x3d0
   ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x160/0x210
   ? lock_release+0xc8/0x620
   ? fs_reclaim_acquire+0x67/0xf0
   ? lock_acquire+0xc7/0x510
   ? poison_range+0x38/0x40
   ? unpoison_range+0x14/0x40
   ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x55/0x120
   btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0x142/0x1e0
   ? find_parent_nodes+0x1830/0x1830
   ? btrfs_inode_flags_to_xflags+0x50/0x50
   iterate_extent_inodes+0x20e/0x580
   ? tree_backref_for_extent+0x230/0x230
   ? lock_downgrade+0x3d0/0x3d0
   ? read_extent_buffer+0xdd/0x110
   ? lock_downgrade+0x3d0/0x3d0
   ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20
   ? lock_acquired+0xbb/0x600
   ? __kasan_check_write+0x14/0x20
   ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x22/0x30
   ? __kasan_check_write+0x14/0x20
   iterate_inodes_from_logical+0x129/0x170
   ? iterate_inodes_from_logical+0x129/0x170
   ? btrfs_inode_flags_to_xflags+0x50/0x50
   ? iterate_extent_inodes+0x580/0x580
   ? __vmalloc_node+0x92/0xb0
   ? init_data_container+0x34/0xb0
   ? init_data_container+0x34/0xb0
   ? kvmalloc_node+0x60/0x80
   btrfs_ioctl_logical_to_ino+0x158/0x230
   btrfs_ioctl+0x205e/0x4040
   ? __might_sleep+0x71/0xe0
   ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x30/0x30
   ? getrusage+0x4b6/0x9c0
   ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20
   ? lock_release+0xc8/0x620
   ? __might_fault+0x64/0xd0
   ? lock_acquire+0xc7/0x510
   ? lock_downgrade+0x3d0/0x3d0
   ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x210/0x210
   ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x210/0x210
   ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20
   ? do_vfs_ioctl+0xfc/0x9d0
   ? ioctl_file_clone+0xe0/0xe0
   ? lock_downgrade+0x3d0/0x3d0
   ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x210/0x210
   ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20
   ? lock_release+0xc8/0x620
   ? __task_pid_nr_ns+0xd3/0x250
   ? lock_acquire+0xc7/0x510
   ? __fget_files+0x160/0x230
   ? __fget_light+0xf2/0x110
   __x64_sys_ioctl+0xc3/0x100
   do_syscall_64+0x37/0x80
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
  RIP: 0033:0x7fd1976e2427
  Code: 00 00 90 48 8b 05 (...)
  RSP: 002b:00007fd1955e5cf8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
  RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fd1955e5f40 RCX: 00007fd1976e2427
  RDX: 00007fd1955e5f48 RSI: 00000000c038943b RDI: 0000000000000004
  RBP: 0000000001000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007fd1955e6120
  R10: 0000557835366b00 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000004
  R13: 00007fd1955e5f48 R14: 00007fd1955e5f40 R15: 00007fd1955e5ef8
  Modules linked in:
  ---[ end trace ec8931a1c36e57be ]---

  (gdb) l *(__tree_mod_log_rewind+0x3b1)
  0xffffffff81893521 is in __tree_mod_log_rewind (fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1210).
  1205                     * the modification. as we're going backwards, we do the
  1206                     * opposite of each operation here.
  1207                     */
  1208                    switch (tm->op) {
  1209                    case MOD_LOG_KEY_REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING:
  1210                            BUG_ON(tm->slot < n);
  1211                            fallthrough;
  1212                    case MOD_LOG_KEY_REMOVE_WHILE_MOVING:
  1213                    case MOD_LOG_KEY_REMOVE:
  1214                            btrfs_set_node_key(eb, &tm->key, tm->slot);

Here's what happens to hit that BUG_ON():

1) We have one tree mod log user (through fiemap or the logical ino ioctl),
   with a sequence number of 1, so we have fs_info->tree_mod_seq == 1;

2) Another task is at ctree.c:balance_level() and we have eb X currently as
   the root of the tree, and we promote its single child, eb Y, as the new
   root.

   Then, at ctree.c:balance_level(), we call:

      tree_mod_log_insert_root(eb X, eb Y, 1);

3) At tree_mod_log_insert_root() we create tree mod log elements for each
   slot of eb X, of operation type MOD_LOG_KEY_REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING each
   with a ->logical pointing to ebX->start. These are placed in an array
   named tm_list.
   Lets assume there are N elements (N pointers in eb X);

4) Then, still at tree_mod_log_insert_root(), we create a tree mod log
   element of operation type MOD_LOG_ROOT_REPLACE, ->logical set to
   ebY->start, ->old_root.logical set to ebX->start, ->old_root.level set
   to the level of eb X and ->generation set to the generation of eb X;

5) Then tree_mod_log_insert_root() calls tree_mod_log_free_eb() with
   tm_list as argument. After that, tree_mod_log_free_eb() calls
   __tree_mod_log_insert() for each member of tm_list in reverse order,
   from highest slot in eb X, slot N - 1, to slot 0 of eb X;

6) __tree_mod_log_insert() sets the sequence number of each given tree mod
   log operation - it increments fs_info->tree_mod_seq and sets
   fs_info->tree_mod_seq as the sequence number of the given tree mod log
   operation.

   This means that for the tm_list created at tree_mod_log_insert_root(),
   the element corresponding to slot 0 of eb X has the highest sequence
   number (1 + N), and the element corresponding to the last slot has the
   lowest sequence number (2);

7) Then, after inserting tm_list's elements into the tree mod log rbtree,
   the MOD_LOG_ROOT_REPLACE element is inserted, which gets the highest
   sequence number, which is N + 2;

8) Back to ctree.c:balance_level(), we free eb X by calling
   btrfs_free_tree_block() on it. Because eb X was created in the current
   transaction, has no other references and writeback did not happen for
   it, we add it back to the free space cache/tree;

9) Later some other task T allocates the metadata extent from eb X, since
   it is marked as free space in the space cache/tree, and uses it as a
   node for some other btree;

10) The tree mod log user task calls btrfs_search_old_slot(), which calls
    get_old_root(), and finally that calls __tree_mod_log_oldest_root()
    with time_seq == 1 and eb_root == eb Y;

11) First iteration of the while loop finds the tree mod log element with
    sequence number N + 2, for the logical address of eb Y and of type
    MOD_LOG_ROOT_REPLACE;

12) Because the operation type is MOD_LOG_ROOT_REPLACE, we don't break out
    of the loop, and set root_logical to point to tm->old_root.logical
    which corresponds to the logical address of eb X;

13) On the next iteration of the while loop, the call to
    tree_mod_log_search_oldest() returns the smallest tree mod log element
    for the logical address of eb X, which has a sequence number of 2, an
    operation type of MOD_LOG_KEY_REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING and corresponds to
    the old slot N - 1 of eb X (eb X had N items in it before being freed);

14) We then break out of the while loop and return the tree mod log operation
    of type MOD_LOG_ROOT_REPLACE (eb Y), and not the one for slot N - 1 of
    eb X, to get_old_root();

15) At get_old_root(), we process the MOD_LOG_ROOT_REPLACE operation
    and set "logical" to the logical address of eb X, which was the old
    root. We then call tree_mod_log_search() passing it the logical
    address of eb X and time_seq == 1;

16) Then before calling tree_mod_log_search(), task T adds a key to eb X,
    which results in adding a tree mod log operation of type
    MOD_LOG_KEY_ADD to the tree mod log - this is done at
    ctree.c:insert_ptr() - but after adding the tree mod log operation
    and before updating the number of items in eb X from 0 to 1...

17) The task at get_old_root() calls tree_mod_log_search() and gets the
    tree mod log operation of type MOD_LOG_KEY_ADD just added by task T.
    Then it enters the following if branch:

    if (old_root && tm && tm->op != MOD_LOG_KEY_REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING) {
       (...)
    } (...)

    Calls read_tree_block() for eb X, which gets a reference on eb X but
    does not lock it - task T has it locked.
    Then it clones eb X while it has nritems set to 0 in its header, before
    task T sets nritems to 1 in eb X's header. From hereupon we use the
    clone of eb X which no other task has access to;

18) Then we call __tree_mod_log_rewind(), passing it the MOD_LOG_KEY_ADD
    mod log operation we just got from tree_mod_log_search() in the
    previous step and the cloned version of eb X;

19) At __tree_mod_log_rewind(), we set the local variable "n" to the number
    of items set in eb X's clone, which is 0. Then we enter the while loop,
    and in its first iteration we process the MOD_LOG_KEY_ADD operation,
    which just decrements "n" from 0 to (u32)-1, since "n" is declared with
    a type of u32. At the end of this iteration we call rb_next() to find the
    next tree mod log operation for eb X, that gives us the mod log operation
    of type MOD_LOG_KEY_REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING, for slot 0, with a sequence
    number of N + 1 (steps 3 to 6);

20) Then we go back to the top of the while loop and trigger the following
    BUG_ON():

        (...)
        switch (tm->op) {
        case MOD_LOG_KEY_REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING:
                 BUG_ON(tm->slot < n);
                 fallthrough;
        (...)

    Because "n" has a value of (u32)-1 (4294967295) and tm->slot is 0.

Fix this by taking a read lock on the extent buffer before cloning it at
ctree.c:get_old_root(). This should be done regardless of the extent
buffer having been freed and reused, as a concurrent task might be
modifying it (while holding a write lock on it).
Reported-by: NZygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20210227155037.GN28049@hungrycats.org/
Fixes: 834328a8 ("Btrfs: tree mod log's old roots could still be part of the tree")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NChen Jun <chenjun102@huawei.com>
Acked-by: N  Weilong Chen <chenweilong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NZheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>
上级 1026615a
......@@ -1367,7 +1367,9 @@ get_old_root(struct btrfs_root *root, u64 time_seq)
"failed to read tree block %llu from get_old_root",
logical);
} else {
btrfs_tree_read_lock(old);
eb = btrfs_clone_extent_buffer(old);
btrfs_tree_read_unlock(old);
free_extent_buffer(old);
}
} else if (old_root) {
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册