提交 5f316b65 编写于 作者: L Luke Nelson 提交者: Daniel Borkmann

riscv, bpf: Add RV32G eBPF JIT

This is an eBPF JIT for RV32G, adapted from the JIT for RV64G and
the 32-bit ARM JIT.

There are two main changes required for this to work compared to
the RV64 JIT.

First, eBPF registers are 64-bit, while RV32G registers are 32-bit.
BPF registers either map directly to 2 RISC-V registers, or reside
in stack scratch space and are saved and restored when used.

Second, many 64-bit ALU operations do not trivially map to 32-bit
operations. Operations that move bits between high and low words,
such as ADD, LSH, MUL, and others must emulate the 64-bit behavior
in terms of 32-bit instructions.

This patch also makes related changes to bpf_jit.h, such
as adding RISC-V instructions required by the RV32 JIT.

Supported features:

The RV32 JIT supports the same features and instructions as the
RV64 JIT, with the following exceptions:

- ALU64 DIV/MOD: Requires loops to implement on 32-bit hardware.

- BPF_XADD | BPF_DW: There's no 8-byte atomic instruction in RV32.

These features are also unsupported on other BPF JITs for 32-bit
architectures.

Testing:

- lib/test_bpf.c
test_bpf: Summary: 378 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [349/366 JIT'ed]
test_bpf: test_skb_segment: Summary: 2 PASSED, 0 FAILED

The tests that are not JITed are all due to use of 64-bit div/mod
or 64-bit xadd.

- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
Summary: 1415 PASSED, 122 SKIPPED, 43 FAILED

Tested both with and without BPF JIT hardening.

This is the same set of tests that pass using the BPF interpreter
with the JIT disabled.

Verification and synthesis:

We developed the RV32 JIT using our automated verification tool,
Serval. We have used Serval in the past to verify patches to the
RV64 JIT. We also used Serval to superoptimize the resulting code
through program synthesis.

You can find the tool and a guide to the approach and results here:
https://github.com/uw-unsat/serval-bpf/tree/rv32-jit-v5Co-developed-by: NXi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NXi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuke Nelson <luke.r.nels@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: NBjörn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NBjörn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200305050207.4159-3-luke.r.nels@gmail.com
上级 ca6cb544
......@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ config RISCV
select ARCH_HAS_PTE_SPECIAL
select ARCH_HAS_MMIOWB
select ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_VIRTUAL
select HAVE_EBPF_JIT if 64BIT
select HAVE_EBPF_JIT
select EDAC_SUPPORT
select ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE
select ARCH_WANT_HUGE_PMD_SHARE if 64BIT
......
# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_JIT) += bpf_jit_core.o bpf_jit_comp64.o
obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_JIT) += bpf_jit_core.o
ifeq ($(CONFIG_ARCH_RV64I),y)
obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_JIT) += bpf_jit_comp64.o
else
obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_JIT) += bpf_jit_comp32.o
endif
......@@ -207,6 +207,8 @@ static inline u32 rv_amo_insn(u8 funct5, u8 aq, u8 rl, u8 rs2, u8 rs1,
return rv_r_insn(funct7, rs2, rs1, funct3, rd, opcode);
}
/* Instructions shared by both RV32 and RV64. */
static inline u32 rv_addi(u8 rd, u8 rs1, u16 imm11_0)
{
return rv_i_insn(imm11_0, rs1, 0, rd, 0x13);
......@@ -262,6 +264,11 @@ static inline u32 rv_sub(u8 rd, u8 rs1, u8 rs2)
return rv_r_insn(0x20, rs2, rs1, 0, rd, 0x33);
}
static inline u32 rv_sltu(u8 rd, u8 rs1, u8 rs2)
{
return rv_r_insn(0, rs2, rs1, 3, rd, 0x33);
}
static inline u32 rv_and(u8 rd, u8 rs1, u8 rs2)
{
return rv_r_insn(0, rs2, rs1, 7, rd, 0x33);
......@@ -297,6 +304,11 @@ static inline u32 rv_mul(u8 rd, u8 rs1, u8 rs2)
return rv_r_insn(1, rs2, rs1, 0, rd, 0x33);
}
static inline u32 rv_mulhu(u8 rd, u8 rs1, u8 rs2)
{
return rv_r_insn(1, rs2, rs1, 3, rd, 0x33);
}
static inline u32 rv_divu(u8 rd, u8 rs1, u8 rs2)
{
return rv_r_insn(1, rs2, rs1, 5, rd, 0x33);
......@@ -332,21 +344,46 @@ static inline u32 rv_bltu(u8 rs1, u8 rs2, u16 imm12_1)
return rv_b_insn(imm12_1, rs2, rs1, 6, 0x63);
}
static inline u32 rv_bgtu(u8 rs1, u8 rs2, u16 imm12_1)
{
return rv_bltu(rs2, rs1, imm12_1);
}
static inline u32 rv_bgeu(u8 rs1, u8 rs2, u16 imm12_1)
{
return rv_b_insn(imm12_1, rs2, rs1, 7, 0x63);
}
static inline u32 rv_bleu(u8 rs1, u8 rs2, u16 imm12_1)
{
return rv_bgeu(rs2, rs1, imm12_1);
}
static inline u32 rv_blt(u8 rs1, u8 rs2, u16 imm12_1)
{
return rv_b_insn(imm12_1, rs2, rs1, 4, 0x63);
}
static inline u32 rv_bgt(u8 rs1, u8 rs2, u16 imm12_1)
{
return rv_blt(rs2, rs1, imm12_1);
}
static inline u32 rv_bge(u8 rs1, u8 rs2, u16 imm12_1)
{
return rv_b_insn(imm12_1, rs2, rs1, 5, 0x63);
}
static inline u32 rv_ble(u8 rs1, u8 rs2, u16 imm12_1)
{
return rv_bge(rs2, rs1, imm12_1);
}
static inline u32 rv_lw(u8 rd, u16 imm11_0, u8 rs1)
{
return rv_i_insn(imm11_0, rs1, 2, rd, 0x03);
}
static inline u32 rv_lbu(u8 rd, u16 imm11_0, u8 rs1)
{
return rv_i_insn(imm11_0, rs1, 4, rd, 0x03);
......@@ -377,6 +414,15 @@ static inline u32 rv_amoadd_w(u8 rd, u8 rs2, u8 rs1, u8 aq, u8 rl)
return rv_amo_insn(0, aq, rl, rs2, rs1, 2, rd, 0x2f);
}
/*
* RV64-only instructions.
*
* These instructions are not available on RV32. Wrap them below a #if to
* ensure that the RV32 JIT doesn't emit any of these instructions.
*/
#if __riscv_xlen == 64
static inline u32 rv_addiw(u8 rd, u8 rs1, u16 imm11_0)
{
return rv_i_insn(imm11_0, rs1, 0, rd, 0x1b);
......@@ -457,6 +503,8 @@ static inline u32 rv_amoadd_d(u8 rd, u8 rs2, u8 rs1, u8 aq, u8 rl)
return rv_amo_insn(0, aq, rl, rs2, rs1, 3, rd, 0x2f);
}
#endif /* __riscv_xlen == 64 */
void bpf_jit_build_prologue(struct rv_jit_context *ctx);
void bpf_jit_build_epilogue(struct rv_jit_context *ctx);
......
此差异已折叠。
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册