提交 5e6f6aa1 编写于 作者: B Benjamin Herrenschmidt

memblock/arm: pfn_valid uses memblock_is_memory()

The implementation is pretty much similar. There is a -small- added
overhead by having another function call and the address shift.

If that becomes a concern, I suppose we could actually have memblock
itself expose a memblock_pfn_valid() which then ARM can use directly
with an appropriate #define...
Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
上级 72d4b0b4
......@@ -237,20 +237,7 @@ static void __init arm_bootmem_free(struct meminfo *mi, unsigned long min,
#ifndef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM
int pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn)
{
struct memblock_type *mem = &memblock.memory;
unsigned int left = 0, right = mem->cnt;
do {
unsigned int mid = (right + left) / 2;
if (pfn < memblock_start_pfn(mem, mid))
right = mid;
else if (pfn >= memblock_end_pfn(mem, mid))
left = mid + 1;
else
return 1;
} while (left < right);
return 0;
return memblock_is_memory(pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(pfn_valid);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册