提交 5e4bf1a5 编写于 作者: I Ingo Molnar

x86/mm: Don't flush the TLB on #WP pmd fixups

If we have a write protection #PF and fix up the pmd then the
hugetlb code [the only user of pmdp_set_access_flags], in its
do_huge_pmd_wp_page() page fault resolution function calls
pmdp_set_access_flags() to mark the pmd permissive again,
and flushes the TLB.

This TLB flush is unnecessary: a flush on #PF is guaranteed on
most (all?) x86 CPUs, and even in the worst-case we'll generate
a spurious fault.

So remove it.

Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20121120120251.GA15742@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
上级 bbee3aec
......@@ -328,7 +328,12 @@ int pmdp_set_access_flags(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
if (changed && dirty) {
*pmdp = entry;
pmd_update_defer(vma->vm_mm, address, pmdp);
flush_tlb_range(vma, address, address + HPAGE_PMD_SIZE);
/*
* We had a write-protection fault here and changed the pmd
* to to more permissive. No need to flush the TLB for that,
* #PF is architecturally guaranteed to do that and in the
* worst-case we'll generate a spurious fault.
*/
}
return changed;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册