提交 599ee329 编写于 作者: L Lars-Peter Clausen 提交者: Takashi Iwai

ALSA: pcm: Use __ffs() instead of ffs() in snd_mask_min()

The difference between __ffs and ffs is that ffs will return a one based
index whereas __ffs will return a zero based index. Furthermore ffs will
check if the passed value is zero and return zero in that case, whereas
__ffs behavior is undefined if the passed parameter is 0.

Since we already check if the mask is 0 before calling ffs and also subtract
1 from the result __ffs is the better choice.
Signed-off-by: NLars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Signed-off-by: NTakashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
上级 cd9978f1
......@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static inline unsigned int snd_mask_min(const struct snd_mask *mask)
int i;
for (i = 0; i < SNDRV_MASK_SIZE; i++) {
if (mask->bits[i])
return ffs(mask->bits[i]) - 1 + (i << 5);
return __ffs(mask->bits[i]) + (i << 5);
}
return 0;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册