提交 583d0fef 编写于 作者: I Ilya Dryomov

libceph: clear msg->con in ceph_msg_release() only

The following bit in ceph_msg_revoke_incoming() is unsafe:

    struct ceph_connection *con = msg->con;
    if (!con)
            return;
    mutex_lock(&con->mutex);
    <more msg->con use>

There is nothing preventing con from getting destroyed right after
msg->con test.  One easy way to reproduce this is to disable message
signing only on the server side and try to map an image.  The system
will go into a

    libceph: read_partial_message ffff880073f0ab68 signature check failed
    libceph: osd0 192.168.255.155:6801 bad crc/signature
    libceph: read_partial_message ffff880073f0ab68 signature check failed
    libceph: osd0 192.168.255.155:6801 bad crc/signature

loop which has to be interrupted with Ctrl-C.  Hit Ctrl-C and you are
likely to end up with a random GP fault if the reset handler executes
"within" ceph_msg_revoke_incoming():

                     <yet another reply w/o a signature>
                                   ...
          <Ctrl-C>
    rbd_obj_request_end
      ceph_osdc_cancel_request
        __unregister_request
          ceph_osdc_put_request
            ceph_msg_revoke_incoming
                                   ...
                                osd_reset
                                  __kick_osd_requests
                                    __reset_osd
                                      remove_osd
                                        ceph_con_close
                                          reset_connection
                                            <clear con->in_msg->con>
                                            <put con ref>
                                              put_osd
                                                <free osd/con>
              <msg->con use> <-- !!!

If ceph_msg_revoke_incoming() executes "before" the reset handler,
osd/con will be leaked because ceph_msg_revoke_incoming() clears
con->in_msg but doesn't put con ref, while reset_connection() only puts
con ref if con->in_msg != NULL.

The current msg->con scheme was introduced by commits 38941f80
("libceph: have messages point to their connection") and 92ce034b
("libceph: have messages take a connection reference"), which defined
when messages get associated with a connection and when that
association goes away.  Part of the problem is that this association is
supposed to go away in much too many places; closing this race entirely
requires either a rework of the existing or an addition of a new layer
of synchronization.

In lieu of that, we can make it *much* less likely to hit by
disassociating messages only on their destruction and resend through
a different connection.  This makes the code simpler and is probably
a good thing to do regardless - this patch adds a msg_con_set() helper
which is is called from only three places: ceph_con_send() and
ceph_con_in_msg_alloc() to set msg->con and ceph_msg_release() to clear
it.
Signed-off-by: NIlya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
上级 a51983e4
......@@ -637,9 +637,6 @@ static int con_close_socket(struct ceph_connection *con)
static void ceph_msg_remove(struct ceph_msg *msg)
{
list_del_init(&msg->list_head);
BUG_ON(msg->con == NULL);
msg->con->ops->put(msg->con);
msg->con = NULL;
ceph_msg_put(msg);
}
......@@ -662,15 +659,14 @@ static void reset_connection(struct ceph_connection *con)
if (con->in_msg) {
BUG_ON(con->in_msg->con != con);
con->in_msg->con = NULL;
ceph_msg_put(con->in_msg);
con->in_msg = NULL;
con->ops->put(con);
}
con->connect_seq = 0;
con->out_seq = 0;
if (con->out_msg) {
BUG_ON(con->out_msg->con != con);
ceph_msg_put(con->out_msg);
con->out_msg = NULL;
}
......@@ -2438,13 +2434,10 @@ static int read_partial_message(struct ceph_connection *con)
*/
static void process_message(struct ceph_connection *con)
{
struct ceph_msg *msg;
struct ceph_msg *msg = con->in_msg;
BUG_ON(con->in_msg->con != con);
con->in_msg->con = NULL;
msg = con->in_msg;
con->in_msg = NULL;
con->ops->put(con);
/* if first message, set peer_name */
if (con->peer_name.type == 0)
......@@ -2918,10 +2911,8 @@ static void con_fault(struct ceph_connection *con)
if (con->in_msg) {
BUG_ON(con->in_msg->con != con);
con->in_msg->con = NULL;
ceph_msg_put(con->in_msg);
con->in_msg = NULL;
con->ops->put(con);
}
/* Requeue anything that hasn't been acked */
......@@ -2977,6 +2968,15 @@ void ceph_messenger_fini(struct ceph_messenger *msgr)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(ceph_messenger_fini);
static void msg_con_set(struct ceph_msg *msg, struct ceph_connection *con)
{
if (msg->con)
msg->con->ops->put(msg->con);
msg->con = con ? con->ops->get(con) : NULL;
BUG_ON(msg->con != con);
}
static void clear_standby(struct ceph_connection *con)
{
/* come back from STANDBY? */
......@@ -3008,9 +3008,7 @@ void ceph_con_send(struct ceph_connection *con, struct ceph_msg *msg)
return;
}
BUG_ON(msg->con != NULL);
msg->con = con->ops->get(con);
BUG_ON(msg->con == NULL);
msg_con_set(msg, con);
BUG_ON(!list_empty(&msg->list_head));
list_add_tail(&msg->list_head, &con->out_queue);
......@@ -3038,16 +3036,15 @@ void ceph_msg_revoke(struct ceph_msg *msg)
{
struct ceph_connection *con = msg->con;
if (!con)
if (!con) {
dout("%s msg %p null con\n", __func__, msg);
return; /* Message not in our possession */
}
mutex_lock(&con->mutex);
if (!list_empty(&msg->list_head)) {
dout("%s %p msg %p - was on queue\n", __func__, con, msg);
list_del_init(&msg->list_head);
BUG_ON(msg->con == NULL);
msg->con->ops->put(msg->con);
msg->con = NULL;
msg->hdr.seq = 0;
ceph_msg_put(msg);
......@@ -3071,16 +3068,13 @@ void ceph_msg_revoke(struct ceph_msg *msg)
*/
void ceph_msg_revoke_incoming(struct ceph_msg *msg)
{
struct ceph_connection *con;
struct ceph_connection *con = msg->con;
BUG_ON(msg == NULL);
if (!msg->con) {
if (!con) {
dout("%s msg %p null con\n", __func__, msg);
return; /* Message not in our possession */
}
con = msg->con;
mutex_lock(&con->mutex);
if (con->in_msg == msg) {
unsigned int front_len = le32_to_cpu(con->in_hdr.front_len);
......@@ -3326,9 +3320,8 @@ static int ceph_con_in_msg_alloc(struct ceph_connection *con, int *skip)
}
if (msg) {
BUG_ON(*skip);
msg_con_set(msg, con);
con->in_msg = msg;
con->in_msg->con = con->ops->get(con);
BUG_ON(con->in_msg->con == NULL);
} else {
/*
* Null message pointer means either we should skip
......@@ -3375,6 +3368,8 @@ static void ceph_msg_release(struct kref *kref)
dout("%s %p\n", __func__, m);
WARN_ON(!list_empty(&m->list_head));
msg_con_set(m, NULL);
/* drop middle, data, if any */
if (m->middle) {
ceph_buffer_put(m->middle);
......
......@@ -2850,9 +2850,6 @@ static struct ceph_msg *get_reply(struct ceph_connection *con,
goto out;
}
if (req->r_reply->con)
dout("%s revoking msg %p from old con %p\n", __func__,
req->r_reply, req->r_reply->con);
ceph_msg_revoke_incoming(req->r_reply);
if (front_len > req->r_reply->front_alloc_len) {
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册