提交 56e827fb 编写于 作者: T Tejun Heo

x86-64, NUMA: consolidate and improve memblk sanity checks

memblk sanity check was scattered around and incomplete.  Consolidate
and improve.

* Confliction detection and cutoff_node() logic are moved to
  numa_cleanup_meminfo().

* numa_cleanup_meminfo() clears the unused memblks before returning.

* Check and warn about invalid input parameters in numa_add_memblk().

* Check the maximum number of memblk isn't exceeded in
  numa_add_memblk().

* numa_cleanup_meminfo() is now called before numa_emulation() so that
  the emulation code also uses the cleaned up version.
Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Cc: Shaohui Zheng <shaohui.zheng@intel.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
上级 2e756be4
......@@ -189,37 +189,23 @@ static void * __init early_node_mem(int nodeid, unsigned long start,
return NULL;
}
static __init int conflicting_memblks(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
int __init numa_add_memblk(int nid, u64 start, u64 end)
{
struct numa_meminfo *mi = &numa_meminfo;
int i;
for (i = 0; i < mi->nr_blks; i++) {
struct numa_memblk *blk = &mi->blk[i];
/* ignore zero length blks */
if (start == end)
return 0;
if (blk->start == blk->end)
continue;
if (blk->end > start && blk->start < end)
return blk->nid;
if (blk->end == end && blk->start == start)
return blk->nid;
/* whine about and ignore invalid blks */
if (start > end || nid < 0 || nid >= MAX_NUMNODES) {
pr_warning("NUMA: Warning: invalid memblk node %d (%Lx-%Lx)\n",
nid, start, end);
return 0;
}
return -1;
}
int __init numa_add_memblk(int nid, u64 start, u64 end)
{
struct numa_meminfo *mi = &numa_meminfo;
int i;
i = conflicting_memblks(start, end);
if (i == nid) {
printk(KERN_WARNING "NUMA: Warning: node %d (%Lx-%Lx) overlaps with itself (%Lx-%Lx)\n",
nid, start, end, numa_nodes[i].start, numa_nodes[i].end);
} else if (i >= 0) {
printk(KERN_ERR "NUMA: node %d (%Lx-%Lx) overlaps with node %d (%Lx-%Lx)\n",
nid, start, end, i,
numa_nodes[i].start, numa_nodes[i].end);
if (mi->nr_blks >= NR_NODE_MEMBLKS) {
pr_err("NUMA: too many memblk ranges\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
......@@ -237,22 +223,6 @@ static void __init numa_remove_memblk_from(int idx, struct numa_meminfo *mi)
(mi->nr_blks - idx) * sizeof(mi->blk[0]));
}
static __init void cutoff_node(int i, unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
{
struct bootnode *nd = &numa_nodes[i];
if (nd->start < start) {
nd->start = start;
if (nd->end < nd->start)
nd->start = nd->end;
}
if (nd->end > end) {
nd->end = end;
if (nd->start > nd->end)
nd->start = nd->end;
}
}
/* Initialize bootmem allocator for a node */
void __init
setup_node_bootmem(int nodeid, unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
......@@ -301,15 +271,44 @@ setup_node_bootmem(int nodeid, unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
static int __init numa_cleanup_meminfo(struct numa_meminfo *mi)
{
const u64 low = 0;
const u64 high = (u64)max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
int i, j, k;
for (i = 0; i < mi->nr_blks; i++) {
struct numa_memblk *bi = &mi->blk[i];
/* make sure all blocks are inside the limits */
bi->start = max(bi->start, low);
bi->end = min(bi->end, high);
/* and there's no empty block */
if (bi->start == bi->end) {
numa_remove_memblk_from(i--, mi);
continue;
}
for (j = i + 1; j < mi->nr_blks; j++) {
struct numa_memblk *bj = &mi->blk[j];
unsigned long start, end;
/*
* See whether there are overlapping blocks. Whine
* about but allow overlaps of the same nid. They
* will be merged below.
*/
if (bi->end > bj->start && bi->start < bj->end) {
if (bi->nid != bj->nid) {
pr_err("NUMA: node %d (%Lx-%Lx) overlaps with node %d (%Lx-%Lx)\n",
bi->nid, bi->start, bi->end,
bj->nid, bj->start, bj->end);
return -EINVAL;
}
pr_warning("NUMA: Warning: node %d (%Lx-%Lx) overlaps with itself (%Lx-%Lx)\n",
bi->nid, bi->start, bi->end,
bj->start, bj->end);
}
/*
* Join together blocks on the same node, holes
* between which don't overlap with memory on other
......@@ -317,8 +316,8 @@ static int __init numa_cleanup_meminfo(struct numa_meminfo *mi)
*/
if (bi->nid != bj->nid)
continue;
start = min(bi->start, bj->start);
end = max(bi->end, bj->end);
start = max(min(bi->start, bj->start), low);
end = min(max(bi->end, bj->end), high);
for (k = 0; k < mi->nr_blks; k++) {
struct numa_memblk *bk = &mi->blk[k];
......@@ -338,6 +337,11 @@ static int __init numa_cleanup_meminfo(struct numa_meminfo *mi)
}
}
for (i = mi->nr_blks; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mi->blk); i++) {
mi->blk[i].start = mi->blk[i].end = 0;
mi->blk[i].nid = NUMA_NO_NODE;
}
return 0;
}
......@@ -824,10 +828,8 @@ void __init initmem_init(void)
if (numa_init[i]() < 0)
continue;
/* clean up the node list */
for (j = 0; j < MAX_NUMNODES; j++)
cutoff_node(j, 0, max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
if (numa_cleanup_meminfo(&numa_meminfo) < 0)
continue;
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_EMU
setup_physnodes(0, max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
if (cmdline && !numa_emulation(0, max_pfn, i == 0, i == 1))
......@@ -836,9 +838,6 @@ void __init initmem_init(void)
nodes_clear(node_possible_map);
nodes_clear(node_online_map);
#endif
if (numa_cleanup_meminfo(&numa_meminfo) < 0)
continue;
if (numa_register_memblks(&numa_meminfo) < 0)
continue;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册