KVM: arm64: Divorce the perf code from oprofile helpers

KVM/arm64 is the sole user of perf_num_counters(), and really
could do without it. Stop using the obsolete API by relying on
the existing probing code.
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NWill Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210414134409.1266357-2-maz@kernel.org

arch/arm64/kvm/perf.c

@@ -50,12 +50,7 @@ static struct perf_guest_info_callbacks kvm_guest_cbs = {
 
 int kvm_perf_init(void)
 {
-	/*
-	 * Check if HW_PERF_EVENTS are supported by checking the number of
-	 * hardware performance counters. This could ensure the presence of
-	 * a physical PMU and CONFIG_PERF_EVENT is selected.
-	 */
-	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_PMU) && perf_num_counters() > 0)
+	if (kvm_pmu_probe_pmuver() != 0xf)
 		static_branch_enable(&kvm_arm_pmu_available);
 
 	return perf_register_guest_info_callbacks(&kvm_guest_cbs);

arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c

@@ -739,7 +739,7 @@ void kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 data,
 	kvm_pmu_create_perf_event(vcpu, select_idx);
 }
 
-static int kvm_pmu_probe_pmuver(void)
+int kvm_pmu_probe_pmuver(void)
 {
 	struct perf_event_attr attr = { };
 	struct perf_event *event;

include/kvm/arm_pmu.h

@@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_get_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_has_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 			    struct kvm_device_attr *attr);
 int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_enable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+int kvm_pmu_probe_pmuver(void);
 #else
 struct kvm_pmu {
 };
@@ -116,6 +117,9 @@ static inline u64 kvm_pmu_get_pmceid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool pmceid1)
 {
 	return 0;
 }
+
+static inline int kvm_pmu_probe_pmuver(void) { return 0xf; }
+
 #endif
 
 #endif