提交 51cba1eb 编写于 作者: K Kees Cook 提交者: Thomas Gleixner

init_on_alloc: Optimize static branches

The state of CONFIG_INIT_ON_ALLOC_DEFAULT_ON (and ...ON_FREE...) did not
change the assembly ordering of the static branches: they were always out
of line. Use the new jump_label macros to check the CONFIG settings to
default to the "expected" state, which slightly optimizes the resulting
assembly code.
Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: NAlexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401232347.2791257-3-keescook@chromium.org
上级 0d66ccc1
......@@ -2904,18 +2904,20 @@ static inline void kernel_poison_pages(struct page *page, int numpages) { }
static inline void kernel_unpoison_pages(struct page *page, int numpages) { }
#endif
DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(init_on_alloc);
DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_MAYBE(CONFIG_INIT_ON_ALLOC_DEFAULT_ON, init_on_alloc);
static inline bool want_init_on_alloc(gfp_t flags)
{
if (static_branch_unlikely(&init_on_alloc))
if (static_branch_maybe(CONFIG_INIT_ON_ALLOC_DEFAULT_ON,
&init_on_alloc))
return true;
return flags & __GFP_ZERO;
}
DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(init_on_free);
DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_MAYBE(CONFIG_INIT_ON_FREE_DEFAULT_ON, init_on_free);
static inline bool want_init_on_free(void)
{
return static_branch_unlikely(&init_on_free);
return static_branch_maybe(CONFIG_INIT_ON_FREE_DEFAULT_ON,
&init_on_free);
}
extern bool _debug_pagealloc_enabled_early;
......
......@@ -167,10 +167,10 @@ unsigned long totalcma_pages __read_mostly;
int percpu_pagelist_fraction;
gfp_t gfp_allowed_mask __read_mostly = GFP_BOOT_MASK;
DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(init_on_alloc);
DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_MAYBE(CONFIG_INIT_ON_ALLOC_DEFAULT_ON, init_on_alloc);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(init_on_alloc);
DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(init_on_free);
DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_MAYBE(CONFIG_INIT_ON_FREE_DEFAULT_ON, init_on_free);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(init_on_free);
static bool _init_on_alloc_enabled_early __read_mostly
......
......@@ -601,7 +601,8 @@ static inline void cache_random_seq_destroy(struct kmem_cache *cachep) { }
static inline bool slab_want_init_on_alloc(gfp_t flags, struct kmem_cache *c)
{
if (static_branch_unlikely(&init_on_alloc)) {
if (static_branch_maybe(CONFIG_INIT_ON_ALLOC_DEFAULT_ON,
&init_on_alloc)) {
if (c->ctor)
return false;
if (c->flags & (SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU | SLAB_POISON))
......@@ -613,7 +614,8 @@ static inline bool slab_want_init_on_alloc(gfp_t flags, struct kmem_cache *c)
static inline bool slab_want_init_on_free(struct kmem_cache *c)
{
if (static_branch_unlikely(&init_on_free))
if (static_branch_maybe(CONFIG_INIT_ON_FREE_DEFAULT_ON,
&init_on_free))
return !(c->ctor ||
(c->flags & (SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU | SLAB_POISON)));
return false;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册