提交 501e0c50 编写于 作者: T Tejun Heo 提交者: Jeff Garzik

libata: initialize qc->dma_dir to DMA_NONE

libata didn't used to init qc->dma_dir to any specific value on qc
initialization and command translation path didn't set qc->dma_dir if
the command doesn't need data transfer.  This made non-data commands
to have random qc->dma_dir.

This usually doesn't cause problem because LLDs usually check
qc->protocol first and look at qc->dma_dir iff the command needs data
transfer but this doesn't hold for all LLDs.

It might be worthwhile to rename qc->dma_dir to qc->data_dir as we use
the field to tag data direction for both PIO and DMA protocols.

This problem has been spotted by James Bottomley.
Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Signed-off-by: NJeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
上级 96bc103f
......@@ -1143,6 +1143,7 @@ static inline void ata_tf_init(struct ata_device *dev, struct ata_taskfile *tf)
static inline void ata_qc_reinit(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
{
qc->dma_dir = DMA_NONE;
qc->__sg = NULL;
qc->flags = 0;
qc->cursect = qc->cursg = qc->cursg_ofs = 0;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册