提交 4f9bf2a2 编写于 作者: S Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 提交者: Jakub Kicinski

tcp: Don't acquire inet_listen_hashbucket::lock with disabled BH.

Commit
   9652dc2e ("tcp: relax listening_hash operations")

removed the need to disable bottom half while acquiring
listening_hash.lock. There are still two callers left which disable
bottom half before the lock is acquired.

On PREEMPT_RT the softirqs are preemptible and local_bh_disable() acts
as a lock to ensure that resources, that are protected by disabling
bottom halves, remain protected.
This leads to a circular locking dependency if the lock acquired with
disabled bottom halves is also acquired with enabled bottom halves
followed by disabling bottom halves. This is the reverse locking order.
It has been observed with inet_listen_hashbucket::lock:

local_bh_disable() + spin_lock(&ilb->lock):
  inet_listen()
    inet_csk_listen_start()
      sk->sk_prot->hash() := inet_hash()
	local_bh_disable()
	__inet_hash()
	  spin_lock(&ilb->lock);
	    acquire(&ilb->lock);

Reverse order: spin_lock(&ilb2->lock) + local_bh_disable():
  tcp_seq_next()
    listening_get_next()
      spin_lock(&ilb2->lock);
	acquire(&ilb2->lock);

  tcp4_seq_show()
    get_tcp4_sock()
      sock_i_ino()
	read_lock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
	  acquire(softirq_ctrl)	// <---- whoops
	  acquire(&sk->sk_callback_lock)

Drop local_bh_disable() around __inet_hash() which acquires
listening_hash->lock. Split inet_unhash() and acquire the
listen_hashbucket lock without disabling bottom halves; the inet_ehash
lock with disabled bottom halves.
Reported-by: NMike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: NSebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/12d6f9879a97cd56c09fb53dee343cbb14f7f1f7.camel@gmx.de
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/X9CheYjuXWc75Spa@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/YgQOebeZ10eNx1W6@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
上级 1127170d
......@@ -637,7 +637,9 @@ int __inet_hash(struct sock *sk, struct sock *osk)
int err = 0;
if (sk->sk_state != TCP_LISTEN) {
local_bh_disable();
inet_ehash_nolisten(sk, osk, NULL);
local_bh_enable();
return 0;
}
WARN_ON(!sk_unhashed(sk));
......@@ -669,45 +671,54 @@ int inet_hash(struct sock *sk)
{
int err = 0;
if (sk->sk_state != TCP_CLOSE) {
local_bh_disable();
if (sk->sk_state != TCP_CLOSE)
err = __inet_hash(sk, NULL);
local_bh_enable();
}
return err;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(inet_hash);
void inet_unhash(struct sock *sk)
static void __inet_unhash(struct sock *sk, struct inet_listen_hashbucket *ilb)
{
struct inet_hashinfo *hashinfo = sk->sk_prot->h.hashinfo;
struct inet_listen_hashbucket *ilb = NULL;
spinlock_t *lock;
if (sk_unhashed(sk))
return;
if (sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) {
ilb = &hashinfo->listening_hash[inet_sk_listen_hashfn(sk)];
lock = &ilb->lock;
} else {
lock = inet_ehash_lockp(hashinfo, sk->sk_hash);
}
spin_lock_bh(lock);
if (sk_unhashed(sk))
goto unlock;
if (rcu_access_pointer(sk->sk_reuseport_cb))
reuseport_stop_listen_sock(sk);
if (ilb) {
struct inet_hashinfo *hashinfo = sk->sk_prot->h.hashinfo;
inet_unhash2(hashinfo, sk);
ilb->count--;
}
__sk_nulls_del_node_init_rcu(sk);
sock_prot_inuse_add(sock_net(sk), sk->sk_prot, -1);
unlock:
spin_unlock_bh(lock);
}
void inet_unhash(struct sock *sk)
{
struct inet_hashinfo *hashinfo = sk->sk_prot->h.hashinfo;
if (sk_unhashed(sk))
return;
if (sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) {
struct inet_listen_hashbucket *ilb;
ilb = &hashinfo->listening_hash[inet_sk_listen_hashfn(sk)];
/* Don't disable bottom halves while acquiring the lock to
* avoid circular locking dependency on PREEMPT_RT.
*/
spin_lock(&ilb->lock);
__inet_unhash(sk, ilb);
spin_unlock(&ilb->lock);
} else {
spinlock_t *lock = inet_ehash_lockp(hashinfo, sk->sk_hash);
spin_lock_bh(lock);
__inet_unhash(sk, NULL);
spin_unlock_bh(lock);
}
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(inet_unhash);
......
......@@ -333,11 +333,8 @@ int inet6_hash(struct sock *sk)
{
int err = 0;
if (sk->sk_state != TCP_CLOSE) {
local_bh_disable();
if (sk->sk_state != TCP_CLOSE)
err = __inet_hash(sk, NULL);
local_bh_enable();
}
return err;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册