提交 4e584046 编写于 作者: Z Zhang Yi 提交者: openeuler-sync-bot

jbd2: fix checkpoint cleanup performance regression

hulk inclusion
category: bugfix
bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I7IO1D
CVE: NA

--------------------------------

journal_clean_one_cp_list() has been merged into
journal_shrink_one_cp_list(), but do chekpoint buffer cleanup from the
committing process is just a best effort, it should stop scan once it
meet a busy buffer, or else it will cause a lot of invalid buffer scan
and checks. We catch a performance regression when doing fs_mark tests
below.

Test cmd:
 ./fs_mark  -d  scratch  -s  1024  -n  10000  -t  1  -D  100  -N  100

Before merging checkpoint buffer cleanup:
 FSUse%        Count         Size    Files/sec     App Overhead
     95        10000         1024       8304.9            49033

After merging checkpoint buffer cleanup:
 FSUse%        Count         Size    Files/sec     App Overhead
     95        10000         1024       7649.0            50012
 FSUse%        Count         Size    Files/sec     App Overhead
     95        10000         1024       2107.1            50871

After merging checkpoint buffer cleanup, the total loop count in
journal_shrink_one_cp_list() could be up to 6,261,600+ (50,000+ ~
100,000+ in general), most of them are invalid. This patch fix it
through passing 'shrink_type' into journal_shrink_one_cp_list() and add
a new 'SHRINK_BUSY_STOP' to indicate it should stop once meet a busy
buffer. After fix, the loop count descending back to 10,000+.

After this fix:
 FSUse%        Count         Size    Files/sec     App Overhead
     95        10000         1024       8558.4            49109
Signed-off-by: NZhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NZhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
(cherry picked from commit 30b833d5)
上级 3616625a
......@@ -349,6 +349,8 @@ int jbd2_cleanup_journal_tail(journal_t *journal)
/* Checkpoint list management */
enum shrink_type {SHRINK_DESTROY, SHRINK_BUSY_STOP, SHRINK_BUSY_SKIP};
/*
* journal_shrink_one_cp_list
*
......@@ -360,7 +362,8 @@ int jbd2_cleanup_journal_tail(journal_t *journal)
* Called with j_list_lock held.
*/
static unsigned long journal_shrink_one_cp_list(struct journal_head *jh,
bool destroy, bool *released)
enum shrink_type type,
bool *released)
{
struct journal_head *last_jh;
struct journal_head *next_jh = jh;
......@@ -376,12 +379,15 @@ static unsigned long journal_shrink_one_cp_list(struct journal_head *jh,
jh = next_jh;
next_jh = jh->b_cpnext;
if (destroy) {
if (type == SHRINK_DESTROY) {
ret = __jbd2_journal_remove_checkpoint(jh);
} else {
ret = jbd2_journal_try_remove_checkpoint(jh);
if (ret < 0)
continue;
if (ret < 0) {
if (type == SHRINK_BUSY_SKIP)
continue;
break;
}
}
nr_freed++;
......@@ -445,7 +451,7 @@ unsigned long jbd2_journal_shrink_checkpoint_list(journal_t *journal,
tid = transaction->t_tid;
freed = journal_shrink_one_cp_list(transaction->t_checkpoint_list,
false, &released);
SHRINK_BUSY_SKIP, &released);
nr_freed += freed;
(*nr_to_scan) -= min(*nr_to_scan, freed);
if (*nr_to_scan == 0)
......@@ -485,19 +491,21 @@ unsigned long jbd2_journal_shrink_checkpoint_list(journal_t *journal,
void __jbd2_journal_clean_checkpoint_list(journal_t *journal, bool destroy)
{
transaction_t *transaction, *last_transaction, *next_transaction;
enum shrink_type type;
bool released;
transaction = journal->j_checkpoint_transactions;
if (!transaction)
return;
type = destroy ? SHRINK_DESTROY : SHRINK_BUSY_STOP;
last_transaction = transaction->t_cpprev;
next_transaction = transaction;
do {
transaction = next_transaction;
next_transaction = transaction->t_cpnext;
journal_shrink_one_cp_list(transaction->t_checkpoint_list,
destroy, &released);
type, &released);
/*
* This function only frees up some memory if possible so we
* dont have an obligation to finish processing. Bail out if
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册