[BLUETOOTH]: Fix locking in hci_sock_dev_event().

We presently use lock_sock() to acquire a lock on a socket in
hci_sock_dev_event(), but this goes BUG because lock_sock()
can sleep and we're already holding a read-write spinlock at
that point. So, we must use the non-sleeping BH version,
bh_lock_sock().

However, hci_sock_dev_event() is called from user context and
hence using simply bh_lock_sock() will deadlock against a
concurrent softirq that tries to acquire a lock on the same
socket. Hence, disabling BH's before acquiring the socket lock
and enable them afterwards, is the proper solution to fix
socket locking in hci_sock_dev_event().
Signed-off-by: NSatyam Sharma <ssatyam@cse.iitk.ac.in>
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c

@@ -665,7 +665,8 @@ static int hci_sock_dev_event(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long event,
 		/* Detach sockets from device */
 		read_lock(&hci_sk_list.lock);
 		sk_for_each(sk, node, &hci_sk_list.head) {
-			lock_sock(sk);
+			local_bh_disable();
+			bh_lock_sock_nested(sk);
 			if (hci_pi(sk)->hdev == hdev) {
 				hci_pi(sk)->hdev = NULL;
 				sk->sk_err = EPIPE;
@@ -674,7 +675,8 @@ static int hci_sock_dev_event(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long event,
 
 				hci_dev_put(hdev);
 			}
-			release_sock(sk);
+			bh_unlock_sock(sk);
+			local_bh_enable();
 		}
 		read_unlock(&hci_sk_list.lock);
 	}