提交 4b211f2b 编写于 作者: M Mathieu Poirier 提交者: Ingo Molnar

sched/core: Streamle calls to task_rq_unlock()

Calls to task_rq_unlock() are done several times in the
__sched_setscheduler() function.  This is fine when only the rq lock needs to be
handled but not so much when other locks come into play.

This patch streamlines the release of the rq lock so that only one
location need to be modified when dealing with more than one lock.

No change of functionality is introduced by this patch.
Tested-by: NDietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: NSteven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Acked-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: bristot@redhat.com
Cc: claudio@evidence.eu.com
Cc: lizefan@huawei.com
Cc: longman@redhat.com
Cc: luca.abeni@santannapisa.it
Cc: tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190719140000.31694-3-juri.lelli@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
上级 c22645f4
......@@ -4712,8 +4712,8 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,
* Changing the policy of the stop threads its a very bad idea:
*/
if (p == rq->stop) {
task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf);
return -EINVAL;
retval = -EINVAL;
goto unlock;
}
/*
......@@ -4731,8 +4731,8 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,
goto change;
p->sched_reset_on_fork = reset_on_fork;
task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf);
return 0;
retval = 0;
goto unlock;
}
change:
......@@ -4745,8 +4745,8 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,
if (rt_bandwidth_enabled() && rt_policy(policy) &&
task_group(p)->rt_bandwidth.rt_runtime == 0 &&
!task_group_is_autogroup(task_group(p))) {
task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf);
return -EPERM;
retval = -EPERM;
goto unlock;
}
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
......@@ -4761,8 +4761,8 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,
*/
if (!cpumask_subset(span, p->cpus_ptr) ||
rq->rd->dl_bw.bw == 0) {
task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf);
return -EPERM;
retval = -EPERM;
goto unlock;
}
}
#endif
......@@ -4781,8 +4781,8 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,
* is available.
*/
if ((dl_policy(policy) || dl_task(p)) && sched_dl_overflow(p, policy, attr)) {
task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf);
return -EBUSY;
retval = -EBUSY;
goto unlock;
}
p->sched_reset_on_fork = reset_on_fork;
......@@ -4840,6 +4840,10 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,
preempt_enable();
return 0;
unlock:
task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf);
return retval;
}
static int _sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p, int policy,
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册