提交 49091d9d 编写于 作者: M Marc Zyngier 提交者: Zheng Zengkai

firmware/efi: Tell memblock about EFI iomem reservations

stable inclusion
from stable-5.10.54
commit 4ed4074c6c6c1498b0d7f3b95a0104e57a6ecc63
bugzilla: 175586 https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I4DVDU

Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=4ed4074c6c6c1498b0d7f3b95a0104e57a6ecc63

--------------------------------

commit 2bab693a upstream.

kexec_load_file() relies on the memblock infrastructure to avoid
stamping over regions of memory that are essential to the survival
of the system.

However, nobody seems to agree how to flag these regions as reserved,
and (for example) EFI only publishes its reservations in /proc/iomem
for the benefit of the traditional, userspace based kexec tool.

On arm64 platforms with GICv3, this can result in the payload being
placed at the location of the LPI tables. Shock, horror!

Let's augment the EFI reservation code with a memblock_reserve() call,
protecting our dear tables from the secondary kernel invasion.
Reported-by: NMoritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>
Tested-by: NMoritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NChen Jun <chenjun102@huawei.com>
Acked-by: NWeilong Chen <chenweilong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NChen Jun <chenjun102@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NZheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>
上级 2cc3007b
......@@ -896,6 +896,7 @@ static int __init efi_memreserve_map_root(void)
static int efi_mem_reserve_iomem(phys_addr_t addr, u64 size)
{
struct resource *res, *parent;
int ret;
res = kzalloc(sizeof(struct resource), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!res)
......@@ -908,7 +909,17 @@ static int efi_mem_reserve_iomem(phys_addr_t addr, u64 size)
/* we expect a conflict with a 'System RAM' region */
parent = request_resource_conflict(&iomem_resource, res);
return parent ? request_resource(parent, res) : 0;
ret = parent ? request_resource(parent, res) : 0;
/*
* Given that efi_mem_reserve_iomem() can be called at any
* time, only call memblock_reserve() if the architecture
* keeps the infrastructure around.
*/
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK) && !ret)
memblock_reserve(addr, size);
return ret;
}
int __ref efi_mem_reserve_persistent(phys_addr_t addr, u64 size)
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册