提交 44419ce7 编写于 作者: E Emil Renner Berthing 提交者: Mark Yao

drm/rockchip: analogix_dp: Use mutex rather than spinlock

On the Samsung Chromebook Plus I get this error with 4.14-rc3:

BUG: scheduling while atomic: kworker/3:1/50/0x00000002
Modules linked in:
CPU: 3 PID: 50 Comm: kworker/3:1 Not tainted 4.14.0-0.rc3-kevin #2
Hardware name: Google Kevin (DT)
Workqueue: events analogix_dp_psr_work
Call trace:
[<ffffff80080873b0>] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x320
[<ffffff80080876e4>] show_stack+0x14/0x20
[<ffffff8008606d38>] dump_stack+0x9c/0xbc
[<ffffff80080c6b5c>] __schedule_bug+0x4c/0x70
[<ffffff80086188c0>] __schedule+0x3f0/0x458
[<ffffff8008618960>] schedule+0x38/0xa0
[<ffffff800861c20c>] schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock+0x84/0xe8
[<ffffff800861c2a0>] schedule_hrtimeout_range+0x10/0x18
[<ffffff800861bcec>] usleep_range+0x64/0x78
[<ffffff8008415a6c>] analogix_dp_transfer+0x16c/0x340
[<ffffff8008412550>] analogix_dpaux_transfer+0x10/0x18
[<ffffff80083ceb14>] drm_dp_dpcd_access+0x4c/0xf0
[<ffffff80083cf614>] drm_dp_dpcd_write+0x1c/0x28
[<ffffff8008413b98>] analogix_dp_disable_psr+0x60/0xa8
[<ffffff800840da3c>] analogix_dp_psr_work+0x4c/0x90
[<ffffff80080bb09c>] process_one_work+0x1d4/0x348
[<ffffff80080bb258>] worker_thread+0x48/0x478
[<ffffff80080c11fc>] kthread+0x12c/0x130
[<ffffff8008084290>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18

Changing rockchip_dp_device::psr_lock to a mutex rather
than spinlock seems to fix the issue.
Signed-off-by: NEmil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk>
Tested-by: NEnric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: NMark Yao <mark.yao@rock-chips.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171004175346.11956-1-kernel@esmil.dk
上级 62676d10
......@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ struct rockchip_dp_device {
struct reset_control *rst;
struct work_struct psr_work;
spinlock_t psr_lock;
struct mutex psr_lock;
unsigned int psr_state;
const struct rockchip_dp_chip_data *data;
......@@ -83,21 +83,20 @@ struct rockchip_dp_device {
static void analogix_dp_psr_set(struct drm_encoder *encoder, bool enabled)
{
struct rockchip_dp_device *dp = to_dp(encoder);
unsigned long flags;
if (!analogix_dp_psr_supported(dp->dev))
return;
dev_dbg(dp->dev, "%s PSR...\n", enabled ? "Entry" : "Exit");
spin_lock_irqsave(&dp->psr_lock, flags);
mutex_lock(&dp->psr_lock);
if (enabled)
dp->psr_state = EDP_VSC_PSR_STATE_ACTIVE;
else
dp->psr_state = ~EDP_VSC_PSR_STATE_ACTIVE;
schedule_work(&dp->psr_work);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dp->psr_lock, flags);
mutex_unlock(&dp->psr_lock);
}
static void analogix_dp_psr_work(struct work_struct *work)
......@@ -105,7 +104,6 @@ static void analogix_dp_psr_work(struct work_struct *work)
struct rockchip_dp_device *dp =
container_of(work, typeof(*dp), psr_work);
int ret;
unsigned long flags;
ret = rockchip_drm_wait_vact_end(dp->encoder.crtc,
PSR_WAIT_LINE_FLAG_TIMEOUT_MS);
......@@ -114,12 +112,12 @@ static void analogix_dp_psr_work(struct work_struct *work)
return;
}
spin_lock_irqsave(&dp->psr_lock, flags);
mutex_lock(&dp->psr_lock);
if (dp->psr_state == EDP_VSC_PSR_STATE_ACTIVE)
analogix_dp_enable_psr(dp->dev);
else
analogix_dp_disable_psr(dp->dev);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dp->psr_lock, flags);
mutex_unlock(&dp->psr_lock);
}
static int rockchip_dp_pre_init(struct rockchip_dp_device *dp)
......@@ -381,7 +379,7 @@ static int rockchip_dp_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master,
dp->plat_data.power_off = rockchip_dp_powerdown;
dp->plat_data.get_modes = rockchip_dp_get_modes;
spin_lock_init(&dp->psr_lock);
mutex_init(&dp->psr_lock);
dp->psr_state = ~EDP_VSC_PSR_STATE_ACTIVE;
INIT_WORK(&dp->psr_work, analogix_dp_psr_work);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册