提交 4091fd94 编写于 作者: L Linus Torvalds

ipc: move the rcu_read_lock() from sem_lock_and_putref() into callers

This is another ipc semaphore locking cleanup, trying to make the
locking more straightforward.  We move the rcu read locking into the
callers of sem_lock_and_putref(), which in general means that we now
mostly do the rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock() in the same
function.

Mostly.  We still have the ipc_addid/newary/freeary mess, and things
like ipcctl_pre_down_nolock().
Acked-by: NDavidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
上级 73b29505
......@@ -322,7 +322,6 @@ static inline struct sem_array *sem_obtain_object_check(struct ipc_namespace *ns
static inline void sem_lock_and_putref(struct sem_array *sma)
{
rcu_read_lock();
sem_lock(sma, NULL, -1);
ipc_rcu_putref(sma);
}
......@@ -1117,6 +1116,7 @@ static int semctl_main(struct ipc_namespace *ns, int semid, int semnum,
return -ENOMEM;
}
rcu_read_lock();
sem_lock_and_putref(sma);
if (sma->sem_perm.deleted) {
sem_unlock(sma, -1);
......@@ -1166,6 +1166,7 @@ static int semctl_main(struct ipc_namespace *ns, int semid, int semnum,
goto out_free;
}
}
rcu_read_lock();
sem_lock_and_putref(sma);
if (sma->sem_perm.deleted) {
sem_unlock(sma, -1);
......@@ -1451,7 +1452,7 @@ static struct sem_undo *find_alloc_undo(struct ipc_namespace *ns, int semid)
}
/* step 3: Acquire the lock on semaphore array */
/* This also does the rcu_read_lock() */
rcu_read_lock();
sem_lock_and_putref(sma);
if (sma->sem_perm.deleted) {
sem_unlock(sma, -1);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册