KVM: SVM: delay svm_vcpu_init_msrpm after svm->vmcb is initialized

Right now, svm_hv_vmcb_dirty_nested_enlightenments has an incorrect
dereference of vmcb->control.reserved_sw before the vmcb is checked
for being non-NULL.  The compiler is usually sinking the dereference
after the check; instead of doing this ourselves in the source,
ensure that svm_hv_vmcb_dirty_nested_enlightenments is only called
with a non-NULL VMCB.
Reported-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Vineeth Pillai <viremana@linux.microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
[Untested for now due to issues with my AMD machine. - Paolo]

arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c

@@ -1406,8 +1406,6 @@ static int svm_create_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		goto error_free_vmsa_page;
 	}
 
-	svm_vcpu_init_msrpm(vcpu, svm->msrpm);
-
 	svm->vmcb01.ptr = page_address(vmcb01_page);
 	svm->vmcb01.pa = __sme_set(page_to_pfn(vmcb01_page) << PAGE_SHIFT);
 
@@ -1419,6 +1417,8 @@ static int svm_create_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	svm_switch_vmcb(svm, &svm->vmcb01);
 	init_vmcb(vcpu);
 
+	svm_vcpu_init_msrpm(vcpu, svm->msrpm);
+
 	svm_init_osvw(vcpu);
 	vcpu->arch.microcode_version = 0x01000065;
 

arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm_onhyperv.h

@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static inline void svm_hv_vmcb_dirty_nested_enlightenments(
 	 * as we mark it dirty unconditionally towards end of vcpu
 	 * init phase.
 	 */
-	if (vmcb && vmcb_is_clean(vmcb, VMCB_HV_NESTED_ENLIGHTENMENTS) &&
+	if (vmcb_is_clean(vmcb, VMCB_HV_NESTED_ENLIGHTENMENTS) &&
 	    hve->hv_enlightenments_control.msr_bitmap)
 		vmcb_mark_dirty(vmcb, VMCB_HV_NESTED_ENLIGHTENMENTS);
 }