提交 3e515645 编写于 作者: B Bruce Allan 提交者: Jeff Kirsher

fm10k: use BIT() macro instead of open-coded bit-shifting

Signed-off-by: NBruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@intel.com>
Tested-by: NKrishneil Singh <Krishneil.k.singh@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
上级 a4fcad65
......@@ -419,7 +419,7 @@ static inline u16 fm10k_desc_unused(struct fm10k_ring *ring)
(&(((union fm10k_rx_desc *)((R)->desc))[i]))
#define FM10K_MAX_TXD_PWR 14
#define FM10K_MAX_DATA_PER_TXD (1 << FM10K_MAX_TXD_PWR)
#define FM10K_MAX_DATA_PER_TXD BIT(FM10K_MAX_TXD_PWR)
/* Tx Descriptors needed, worst case */
#define TXD_USE_COUNT(S) DIV_ROUND_UP((S), FM10K_MAX_DATA_PER_TXD)
......
......@@ -354,7 +354,7 @@ struct fm10k_hw;
#define FM10K_VLAN_TABLE_VID_MAX 4096
#define FM10K_VLAN_TABLE_VSI_MAX 64
#define FM10K_VLAN_LENGTH_SHIFT 16
#define FM10K_VLAN_CLEAR (1 << 15)
#define FM10K_VLAN_CLEAR BIT(15)
#define FM10K_VLAN_ALL \
((FM10K_VLAN_TABLE_VID_MAX - 1) << FM10K_VLAN_LENGTH_SHIFT)
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册