提交 3dcbdb13 编写于 作者: S Shmulik Ladkani 提交者: David S. Miller

net: gso: Fix skb_segment splat when splitting gso_size mangled skb having linear-headed frag_list

Historically, support for frag_list packets entering skb_segment() was
limited to frag_list members terminating on exact same gso_size
boundaries. This is verified with a BUG_ON since commit 89319d38
("net: Add frag_list support to skb_segment"), quote:

    As such we require all frag_list members terminate on exact MSS
    boundaries.  This is checked using BUG_ON.
    As there should only be one producer in the kernel of such packets,
    namely GRO, this requirement should not be difficult to maintain.

However, since commit 6578171a ("bpf: add bpf_skb_change_proto helper"),
the "exact MSS boundaries" assumption no longer holds:
An eBPF program using bpf_skb_change_proto() DOES modify 'gso_size', but
leaves the frag_list members as originally merged by GRO with the
original 'gso_size'. Example of such programs are bpf-based NAT46 or
NAT64.

This lead to a kernel BUG_ON for flows involving:
 - GRO generating a frag_list skb
 - bpf program performing bpf_skb_change_proto() or bpf_skb_adjust_room()
 - skb_segment() of the skb

See example BUG_ON reports in [0].

In commit 13acc94e ("net: permit skb_segment on head_frag frag_list skb"),
skb_segment() was modified to support the "gso_size mangling" case of
a frag_list GRO'ed skb, but *only* for frag_list members having
head_frag==true (having a page-fragment head).

Alas, GRO packets having frag_list members with a linear kmalloced head
(head_frag==false) still hit the BUG_ON.

This commit adds support to skb_segment() for a 'head_skb' packet having
a frag_list whose members are *non* head_frag, with gso_size mangled, by
disabling SG and thus falling-back to copying the data from the given
'head_skb' into the generated segmented skbs - as suggested by Willem de
Bruijn [1].

Since this approach involves the penalty of skb_copy_and_csum_bits()
when building the segments, care was taken in order to enable this
solution only when required:
 - untrusted gso_size, by testing SKB_GSO_DODGY is set
   (SKB_GSO_DODGY is set by any gso_size mangling functions in
    net/core/filter.c)
 - the frag_list is non empty, its item is a non head_frag, *and* the
   headlen of the given 'head_skb' does not match the gso_size.

[0]
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20190826170724.25ff616f@pixies/
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/9265b93f-253d-6b8c-f2b8-4b54eff1835c@fb.com/

[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CA+FuTSfVsgNDi7c=GUU8nMg2hWxF2SjCNLXetHeVPdnxAW5K-w@mail.gmail.com/

Fixes: 6578171a ("bpf: add bpf_skb_change_proto helper")
Suggested-by: NWillem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NShmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NWillem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Reviewed-by: NAlexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
上级 8652f17c
......@@ -3664,6 +3664,25 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_segment(struct sk_buff *head_skb,
int pos;
int dummy;
if (list_skb && !list_skb->head_frag && skb_headlen(list_skb) &&
(skb_shinfo(head_skb)->gso_type & SKB_GSO_DODGY)) {
/* gso_size is untrusted, and we have a frag_list with a linear
* non head_frag head.
*
* (we assume checking the first list_skb member suffices;
* i.e if either of the list_skb members have non head_frag
* head, then the first one has too).
*
* If head_skb's headlen does not fit requested gso_size, it
* means that the frag_list members do NOT terminate on exact
* gso_size boundaries. Hence we cannot perform skb_frag_t page
* sharing. Therefore we must fallback to copying the frag_list
* skbs; we do so by disabling SG.
*/
if (mss != GSO_BY_FRAGS && mss != skb_headlen(head_skb))
features &= ~NETIF_F_SG;
}
__skb_push(head_skb, doffset);
proto = skb_network_protocol(head_skb, &dummy);
if (unlikely(!proto))
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册