提交 3d86e352 编写于 作者: D David S. Miller

Merge branch 'addrlabel-no-rtnl-locking'

Florian Westphal says:

====================
addrlabel: don't use rtnl locking

addrlabel doesn't appear to require rtnl lock as the addrlabel
table uses a spinlock to serialize add/delete operations.

Also, entries are reference counted so it should be safe
to call the rtnl ops without the rtnl mutex.
====================
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
......@@ -405,6 +405,18 @@ static const struct nla_policy ifal_policy[IFAL_MAX+1] = {
[IFAL_LABEL] = { .len = sizeof(u32), },
};
static bool addrlbl_ifindex_exists(struct net *net, int ifindex)
{
struct net_device *dev;
rcu_read_lock();
dev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(net, ifindex);
rcu_read_unlock();
return dev != NULL;
}
static int ip6addrlbl_newdel(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
......@@ -439,7 +451,7 @@ static int ip6addrlbl_newdel(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
switch (nlh->nlmsg_type) {
case RTM_NEWADDRLABEL:
if (ifal->ifal_index &&
!__dev_get_by_index(net, ifal->ifal_index))
!addrlbl_ifindex_exists(net, ifal->ifal_index))
return -EINVAL;
err = ip6addrlbl_add(net, pfx, ifal->ifal_prefixlen,
......@@ -548,7 +560,7 @@ static int ip6addrlbl_get(struct sk_buff *in_skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
return -EINVAL;
if (ifal->ifal_index &&
!__dev_get_by_index(net, ifal->ifal_index))
!addrlbl_ifindex_exists(net, ifal->ifal_index))
return -EINVAL;
if (!tb[IFAL_ADDRESS])
......@@ -593,10 +605,10 @@ static int ip6addrlbl_get(struct sk_buff *in_skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
void __init ipv6_addr_label_rtnl_register(void)
{
__rtnl_register(PF_INET6, RTM_NEWADDRLABEL, ip6addrlbl_newdel,
NULL, 0);
NULL, RTNL_FLAG_DOIT_UNLOCKED);
__rtnl_register(PF_INET6, RTM_DELADDRLABEL, ip6addrlbl_newdel,
NULL, 0);
NULL, RTNL_FLAG_DOIT_UNLOCKED);
__rtnl_register(PF_INET6, RTM_GETADDRLABEL, ip6addrlbl_get,
ip6addrlbl_dump, 0);
ip6addrlbl_dump, RTNL_FLAG_DOIT_UNLOCKED);
}
......@@ -195,6 +195,46 @@ kci_test_route_get()
echo "PASS: route get"
}
kci_test_addrlabel()
{
ret=0
ip addrlabel add prefix dead::/64 dev lo label 1
check_err $?
ip addrlabel list |grep -q "prefix dead::/64 dev lo label 1"
check_err $?
ip addrlabel del prefix dead::/64 dev lo label 1 2> /dev/null
check_err $?
ip addrlabel add prefix dead::/64 label 1 2> /dev/null
check_err $?
ip addrlabel del prefix dead::/64 label 1 2> /dev/null
check_err $?
# concurrent add/delete
for i in $(seq 1 1000); do
ip addrlabel add prefix 1c3::/64 label 12345 2>/dev/null
done &
for i in $(seq 1 1000); do
ip addrlabel del prefix 1c3::/64 label 12345 2>/dev/null
done
wait
ip addrlabel del prefix 1c3::/64 label 12345 2>/dev/null
if [ $ret -ne 0 ];then
echo "FAIL: ipv6 addrlabel"
return 1
fi
echo "PASS: ipv6 addrlabel"
}
kci_test_rtnl()
{
kci_add_dummy
......@@ -208,6 +248,7 @@ kci_test_rtnl()
kci_test_tc
kci_test_gre
kci_test_bridge
kci_test_addrlabel
kci_del_dummy
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册