padata: add separate cpuhp node for CPUHP_PADATA_DEAD
Removing the pcrypt module triggers this: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdead000000000122 CPU: 5 PID: 264 Comm: modprobe Not tainted 5.6.0+ #2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC RIP: 0010:__cpuhp_state_remove_instance+0xcc/0x120 Call Trace: padata_sysfs_release+0x74/0xce kobject_put+0x81/0xd0 padata_free+0x12/0x20 pcrypt_exit+0x43/0x8ee [pcrypt] padata instances wrongly use the same hlist node for the online and dead states, so __padata_free()'s second cpuhp remove call chokes on the node that the first poisoned. cpuhp multi-instance callbacks only walk forward in cpuhp_step->list and the same node is linked in both the online and dead lists, so the list corruption that results from padata_alloc() adding the node to a second list without removing it from the first doesn't cause problems as long as no instances are freed. Avoid the issue by giving each state its own node. Fixes: 894c9ef9 ("padata: validate cpumask without removed CPU during offline") Signed-off-by: NDaniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com> Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com> Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.4+ Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录