drm/irq: Don't call ->get_vblank_counter directly from irq_uninstall/cleanup
The pipe might already have been shut down, and then it's not a good idea to call hw accessor functions. Instead use the same logic as drm_vblank_off which has all the necessary checks to avoid troubles or inconsistency. Noticed by Imre while reviewing my patches to remove some sanity checks from ->get_vblank_counter. v2: Try harder. disable_and_save can still access the vblank stuff when vblank->enabled isn't set. It has to, since vlbank irq could be disable but the pipe is still on when being called from drm_vblank_off. But we still want to use that code for more code sharing. So add a check for vblank->enabled on top - if that's not set we shouldn't have anyone waiting for the vblank. If we have that's a pretty serious bug. The other issue that Imre spotted is drm_vblank_cleanup. That code again calls disable_and_save and so suffers from the same issues. But really drm_irq_uninstall should have cleaned that all up, so replace the code with WARN_ON. Note that we can't delete the timer cleanup since drivers aren't required to use drm_irq_install/uninstall, but can do their own irq handling. v3: Make it clear that all that gunk in drm_irq_uninstall is really just bandaids for UMS races between the irq/vblank code. In UMS userspace is in control of enabling/disabling interrupts in general and vblanks specifically. v4: Imre observed that KMS drivers all call drm_vblank_cleanup before drm_irq_uninstall (as they should), so again the code in there is dead for KMS (due to dev->num_crtcs == 0 after drm_vblank_cleanup). Or should be, so only WARN for KMS - with UMS userspace could try to do evil things. v5: After more discussion on irc we've gone back to v3: the del_timer_sync is required in all cases in drm_vblank_cleanup, but let's restrict the WARN_ON to kms drivers only. Imre was also concerned that bad things could happen without the disable_and_save call. But we immediately free vblank structures afterwards which makes the save useless. And drm_handle_vblank has a check for dev->num_crtcs to avoid surprises with ums. Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Acked-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录