提交 39efd4ec 编写于 作者: M Martin Schwidefsky

s390/ptrace: race of single stepping vs signal delivery

The current single step code is racy in regard to concurrent delivery
of signals. If a signal is delivered after a PER program check occurred
but before the TIF_PER_TRAP bit has been checked in entry[64].S the code
clears TIF_PER_TRAP and then calls do_signal. This is wrong, if the
instruction completed (or has been suppressed) a SIGTRAP should be
delivered to the debugger in any case. Only if the instruction has been
nullified the SIGTRAP may not be send.

The new logic always sets TIF_PER_TRAP if the program check indicates PER
tracing but removes it again for all program checks that are nullifying.
The effect is that for each change in the PSW address we now get a
single SIGTRAP.
Reported-by: NAndreas Arnez <arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
上级 c68dba20
......@@ -231,12 +231,12 @@ sysc_work:
jo sysc_mcck_pending
tm __TI_flags+3(%r12),_TIF_NEED_RESCHED
jo sysc_reschedule
tm __TI_flags+3(%r12),_TIF_PER_TRAP
jo sysc_singlestep
tm __TI_flags+3(%r12),_TIF_SIGPENDING
jo sysc_sigpending
tm __TI_flags+3(%r12),_TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME
jo sysc_notify_resume
tm __TI_flags+3(%r12),_TIF_PER_TRAP
jo sysc_singlestep
j sysc_return # beware of critical section cleanup
#
......@@ -259,7 +259,6 @@ sysc_mcck_pending:
# _TIF_SIGPENDING is set, call do_signal
#
sysc_sigpending:
ni __TI_flags+3(%r12),255-_TIF_PER_TRAP # clear TIF_PER_TRAP
lr %r2,%r11 # pass pointer to pt_regs
l %r1,BASED(.Ldo_signal)
basr %r14,%r1 # call do_signal
......@@ -286,7 +285,7 @@ sysc_notify_resume:
# _TIF_PER_TRAP is set, call do_per_trap
#
sysc_singlestep:
ni __TI_flags+3(%r12),255-(_TIF_SYSCALL | _TIF_PER_TRAP)
ni __TI_flags+3(%r12),255-_TIF_PER_TRAP
lr %r2,%r11 # pass pointer to pt_regs
l %r1,BASED(.Ldo_per_trap)
la %r14,BASED(sysc_return)
......
......@@ -262,12 +262,12 @@ sysc_work:
jo sysc_mcck_pending
tm __TI_flags+7(%r12),_TIF_NEED_RESCHED
jo sysc_reschedule
tm __TI_flags+7(%r12),_TIF_PER_TRAP
jo sysc_singlestep
tm __TI_flags+7(%r12),_TIF_SIGPENDING
jo sysc_sigpending
tm __TI_flags+7(%r12),_TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME
jo sysc_notify_resume
tm __TI_flags+7(%r12),_TIF_PER_TRAP
jo sysc_singlestep
j sysc_return # beware of critical section cleanup
#
......@@ -288,7 +288,6 @@ sysc_mcck_pending:
# _TIF_SIGPENDING is set, call do_signal
#
sysc_sigpending:
ni __TI_flags+7(%r12),255-_TIF_PER_TRAP # clear TIF_PER_TRAP
lgr %r2,%r11 # pass pointer to pt_regs
brasl %r14,do_signal
tm __TI_flags+7(%r12),_TIF_SYSCALL
......@@ -313,7 +312,7 @@ sysc_notify_resume:
# _TIF_PER_TRAP is set, call do_per_trap
#
sysc_singlestep:
ni __TI_flags+7(%r12),255-(_TIF_SYSCALL | _TIF_PER_TRAP)
ni __TI_flags+7(%r12),255-_TIF_PER_TRAP
lgr %r2,%r11 # pass pointer to pt_regs
larl %r14,sysc_return
jg do_per_trap
......
......@@ -461,6 +461,8 @@ void do_signal(struct pt_regs *regs)
/* Restart system call with magic TIF bit. */
regs->gprs[2] = regs->orig_gpr2;
set_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL);
if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SINGLE_STEP))
set_thread_flag(TIF_PER_TRAP);
break;
}
}
......
......@@ -277,10 +277,16 @@ static inline int do_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, int access)
unsigned int flags;
int fault;
tsk = current;
/*
* The instruction that caused the program check has
* been nullified. Don't signal single step via SIGTRAP.
*/
clear_tsk_thread_flag(tsk, TIF_PER_TRAP);
if (notify_page_fault(regs))
return 0;
tsk = current;
mm = tsk->mm;
trans_exc_code = regs->int_parm_long;
......@@ -376,11 +382,6 @@ static inline int do_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, int access)
goto retry;
}
}
/*
* The instruction that caused the program check will
* be repeated. Don't signal single step via SIGTRAP.
*/
clear_tsk_thread_flag(tsk, TIF_PER_TRAP);
fault = 0;
out_up:
up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
......@@ -427,6 +428,12 @@ void __kprobes do_asce_exception(struct pt_regs *regs)
struct vm_area_struct *vma;
unsigned long trans_exc_code;
/*
* The instruction that caused the program check has
* been nullified. Don't signal single step via SIGTRAP.
*/
clear_tsk_thread_flag(current, TIF_PER_TRAP);
trans_exc_code = regs->int_parm_long;
if (unlikely(!user_space_fault(trans_exc_code) || in_atomic() || !mm))
goto no_context;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册