selftests/seccomp: Add test for unknown SECCOMP_RET kill behavior

While we were testing for the behavior of unknown seccomp filter return
values, there was no test for how it acted in a thread group. Add a test
in the thread group tests for this.
Reviewed-by: NShuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Acked-by: NChristian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c

@@ -774,8 +774,15 @@ void *kill_thread(void *data)
 	return (void *)SIBLING_EXIT_UNKILLED;
 }
 
+enum kill_t {
+	KILL_THREAD,
+	KILL_PROCESS,
+	RET_UNKNOWN
+};
+
 /* Prepare a thread that will kill itself or both of us. */
-void kill_thread_or_group(struct __test_metadata *_metadata, bool kill_process)
+void kill_thread_or_group(struct __test_metadata *_metadata,
+			  enum kill_t kill_how)
 {
 	pthread_t thread;
 	void *status;
@@ -791,11 +798,12 @@ void kill_thread_or_group(struct __test_metadata *_metadata, bool kill_process)
 		.len = (unsigned short)ARRAY_SIZE(filter_thread),
 		.filter = filter_thread,
 	};
+	int kill = kill_how == KILL_PROCESS ? SECCOMP_RET_KILL_PROCESS : 0xAAAAAAAAA;
 	struct sock_filter filter_process[] = {
 		BPF_STMT(BPF_LD|BPF_W|BPF_ABS,
 			offsetof(struct seccomp_data, nr)),
 		BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP|BPF_JEQ|BPF_K, __NR_prctl, 0, 1),
-		BPF_STMT(BPF_RET|BPF_K, SECCOMP_RET_KILL_PROCESS),
+		BPF_STMT(BPF_RET|BPF_K, kill),
 		BPF_STMT(BPF_RET|BPF_K, SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW),
 	};
 	struct sock_fprog prog_process = {
@@ -808,13 +816,15 @@ void kill_thread_or_group(struct __test_metadata *_metadata, bool kill_process)
 	}
 
 	ASSERT_EQ(0, seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, 0,
-			     kill_process ? &prog_process : &prog_thread));
+			     kill_how == KILL_THREAD ? &prog_thread
+						     : &prog_process));
 
 	/*
 	 * Add the KILL_THREAD rule again to make sure that the KILL_PROCESS
 	 * flag cannot be downgraded by a new filter.
 	 */
-	ASSERT_EQ(0, seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, 0, &prog_thread));
+	if (kill_how == KILL_PROCESS)
+		ASSERT_EQ(0, seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, 0, &prog_thread));
 
 	/* Start a thread that will exit immediately. */
 	ASSERT_EQ(0, pthread_create(&thread, NULL, kill_thread, (void *)false));
@@ -842,7 +852,7 @@ TEST(KILL_thread)
 	child_pid = fork();
 	ASSERT_LE(0, child_pid);
 	if (child_pid == 0) {
-		kill_thread_or_group(_metadata, false);
+		kill_thread_or_group(_metadata, KILL_THREAD);
 		_exit(38);
 	}
 
@@ -861,7 +871,7 @@ TEST(KILL_process)
 	child_pid = fork();
 	ASSERT_LE(0, child_pid);
 	if (child_pid == 0) {
-		kill_thread_or_group(_metadata, true);
+		kill_thread_or_group(_metadata, KILL_PROCESS);
 		_exit(38);
 	}
 
@@ -872,6 +882,27 @@ TEST(KILL_process)
 	ASSERT_EQ(SIGSYS, WTERMSIG(status));
 }
 
+TEST(KILL_unknown)
+{
+	int status;
+	pid_t child_pid;
+
+	child_pid = fork();
+	ASSERT_LE(0, child_pid);
+	if (child_pid == 0) {
+		kill_thread_or_group(_metadata, RET_UNKNOWN);
+		_exit(38);
+	}
+
+	ASSERT_EQ(child_pid, waitpid(child_pid, &status, 0));
+
+	/* If the entire process was killed, we'll see SIGSYS. */
+	EXPECT_TRUE(WIFSIGNALED(status)) {
+		TH_LOG("Unknown SECCOMP_RET is only killing the thread?");
+	}
+	ASSERT_EQ(SIGSYS, WTERMSIG(status));
+}
+
 /* TODO(wad) add 64-bit versus 32-bit arg tests. */
 TEST(arg_out_of_range)
 {