Documentation: RISC-V: Fix a typo in patch-acceptance

I just stumbled on this when modifying the docs.
Reviewed-by: NAnup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221207020815.16214-2-palmer@rivosinc.comSigned-off-by: NPalmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
上级 9abf2313
...@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ their own custom extensions. These custom extensions aren't required ...@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ their own custom extensions. These custom extensions aren't required
to go through any review or ratification process by the RISC-V to go through any review or ratification process by the RISC-V
Foundation. To avoid the maintenance complexity and potential Foundation. To avoid the maintenance complexity and potential
performance impact of adding kernel code for implementor-specific performance impact of adding kernel code for implementor-specific
RISC-V extensions, we'll only to accept patches for extensions that RISC-V extensions, we'll only accept patches for extensions that
have been officially frozen or ratified by the RISC-V Foundation. have been officially frozen or ratified by the RISC-V Foundation.
(Implementors, may, of course, maintain their own Linux kernel trees (Implementors, may, of course, maintain their own Linux kernel trees
containing code for any custom extensions that they wish.) containing code for any custom extensions that they wish.)
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册