Documentation: RISC-V: Fix a typo in patch-acceptance

I just stumbled on this when modifying the docs.
Reviewed-by: NAnup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221207020815.16214-2-palmer@rivosinc.comSigned-off-by: NPalmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
上级 9abf2313
......@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ their own custom extensions. These custom extensions aren't required
to go through any review or ratification process by the RISC-V
Foundation. To avoid the maintenance complexity and potential
performance impact of adding kernel code for implementor-specific
RISC-V extensions, we'll only to accept patches for extensions that
RISC-V extensions, we'll only accept patches for extensions that
have been officially frozen or ratified by the RISC-V Foundation.
(Implementors, may, of course, maintain their own Linux kernel trees
containing code for any custom extensions that they wish.)
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册