“45250f4b7121bcfba7f05030fab35435b02039e7”上不存在“...native/git@gitcode.net:openanolis/dragonwell8_jdk.git”
nfc: replace improper check device_is_registered() in netlink related functions
stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.115 commit 8a9e7c64f4a02c4c397e55ba379609168ec7df4a category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I5B79D CVE: CVE-2022-1974 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=8a9e7c64f4a02c4c397e55ba379609168ec7df4a -------------------------------- commit da5c0f11 upstream. The device_is_registered() in nfc core is used to check whether nfc device is registered in netlink related functions such as nfc_fw_download(), nfc_dev_up() and so on. Although device_is_registered() is protected by device_lock, there is still a race condition between device_del() and device_is_registered(). The root cause is that kobject_del() in device_del() is not protected by device_lock. (cleanup task) | (netlink task) | nfc_unregister_device | nfc_fw_download device_del | device_lock ... | if (!device_is_registered)//(1) kobject_del//(2) | ... ... | device_unlock The device_is_registered() returns the value of state_in_sysfs and the state_in_sysfs is set to zero in kobject_del(). If we pass check in position (1), then set zero in position (2). As a result, the check in position (1) is useless. This patch uses bool variable instead of device_is_registered() to judge whether the nfc device is registered, which is well synchronized. Fixes: 3e256b8f ("NFC: add nfc subsystem core") Signed-off-by: NDuoming Zhou <duoming@zju.edu.cn> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: NBaisong Zhong <zhongbaisong@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NXiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NWei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NZheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录