提交 358ed624 编写于 作者: T Talal Ahmad 提交者: David S. Miller

tcp: call sk_wmem_schedule before sk_mem_charge in zerocopy path

sk_wmem_schedule makes sure that sk_forward_alloc has enough
bytes for charging that is going to be done by sk_mem_charge.

In the transmit zerocopy path, there is sk_mem_charge but there was
no call to sk_wmem_schedule. This change adds that call.

Without this call to sk_wmem_schedule, sk_forward_alloc can go
negetive which is a bug because sk_forward_alloc is a per-socket
space that has been forward charged so this can't be negative.

Fixes: f214f915 ("tcp: enable MSG_ZEROCOPY")
Signed-off-by: NTalal Ahmad <talalahmad@google.com>
Reviewed-by: NWillem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Reviewed-by: NWei Wang <weiwan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: NSoheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
上级 43b90bfa
......@@ -1375,6 +1375,9 @@ int tcp_sendmsg_locked(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size)
}
pfrag->offset += copy;
} else {
if (!sk_wmem_schedule(sk, copy))
goto wait_for_space;
err = skb_zerocopy_iter_stream(sk, skb, msg, copy, uarg);
if (err == -EMSGSIZE || err == -EEXIST) {
tcp_mark_push(tp, skb);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册