ARM: 9202/1: kasan: support CONFIG_KASAN_VMALLOC

mainline inclusion
from mainline-v6.0-rc1
commit 565cbaad
category: bugfix
bugzilla: 187411, https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I5O600?from=project-issue
CVE: NA

Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=565cbaad83d83e288927b96565211109bc984007

--------------------------------

Simply make shadow of vmalloc area mapped on demand.

Since the virtual address of vmalloc for Arm is also between
MODULE_VADDR and 0x100000000 (ZONE_HIGHMEM), which means the shadow
address has already included between KASAN_SHADOW_START and
KASAN_SHADOW_END.
Thus we need to change nothing for memory map of Arm.

This can fix ARM_MODULE_PLTS with KASan, support KASan for higmem
and support CONFIG_VMAP_STACK with KASan.
Signed-off-by: NLecopzer Chen <lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com>
Tested-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRussell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NXia Longlong <xialonglong1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NKefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NZheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>

arch/arm/Kconfig

@@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ config ARM
 	select HAVE_ARCH_KFENCE if MMU
 	select HAVE_ARCH_KGDB if !CPU_ENDIAN_BE32 && MMU
 	select HAVE_ARCH_KASAN if MMU && !XIP_KERNEL
+	select HAVE_ARCH_KASAN_VMALLOC if HAVE_ARCH_KASAN
 	select HAVE_ARCH_MMAP_RND_BITS if MMU
 	select HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP
 	select HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER if AEABI && !OABI_COMPAT

arch/arm/mm/kasan_init.c

@@ -236,7 +236,11 @@ void __init kasan_init(void)
 
 	clear_pgds(KASAN_SHADOW_START, KASAN_SHADOW_END);
 
-	kasan_populate_early_shadow(kasan_mem_to_shadow((void *)VMALLOC_START),
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KASAN_VMALLOC))
+		kasan_populate_early_shadow(kasan_mem_to_shadow((void *)VMALLOC_START),
+					    kasan_mem_to_shadow((void *)VMALLOC_END));
+
+	kasan_populate_early_shadow(kasan_mem_to_shadow((void *)VMALLOC_END),
 				    kasan_mem_to_shadow((void *)-1UL) + 1);
 
 	for_each_mem_range(i, &pa_start, &pa_end) {