leds: leds-gpio: set devm_gpio_request_one() flags param correctly

commit a99d76f9 leds: leds-gpio: use gpio_request_one

changed the leds-gpio driver to use gpio_request_one() instead
of gpio_request() + gpio_direction_output()

Unfortunately, it also made a semantic change that breaks the
leds-gpio driver.

The gpio_request_one() flags parameter was set to:

GPIOF_DIR_OUT | (led_dat->active_low ^ state)

Since GPIOF_DIR_OUT is 0, the final flags value will just be the
XOR'ed value of led_dat->active_low and state.

This value were used to distinguish between HIGH/LOW output initial
level and call gpio_direction_output() accordingly.

With this new semantic gpio_request_one() will take the flags value
of 1 as a configuration of input direction (GPIOF_DIR_IN) and will
call gpio_direction_input() instead of gpio_direction_output().

int gpio_request_one(unsigned gpio, unsigned long flags, const char *label)
{
..
	if (flags & GPIOF_DIR_IN)
		err = gpio_direction_input(gpio);
	else
		err = gpio_direction_output(gpio,
				(flags & GPIOF_INIT_HIGH) ? 1 : 0);
..
}

The right semantic is to evaluate led_dat->active_low ^ state and
set the output initial level explicitly.
Signed-off-by: NJavier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
Reported-by: NArnaud Patard <arnaud.patard@rtp-net.org>
Tested-by: NEzequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: NBryan Wu <cooloney@gmail.com>

drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c

@@ -127,8 +127,9 @@ static int create_gpio_led(const struct gpio_led *template,
 		led_dat->cdev.flags |= LED_CORE_SUSPENDRESUME;
 
 	ret = devm_gpio_request_one(parent, template->gpio,
-			GPIOF_DIR_OUT | (led_dat->active_low ^ state),
-			template->name);
+				    (led_dat->active_low ^ state) ?
+				    GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH : GPIOF_OUT_INIT_LOW,
+				    template->name);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;