mm, gfp: escalatedly define GFP_HIGHUSER and GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE
GFP_USER, GFP_HIGHUSER and GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE are escalatedly confined defined, also implied by their names: GFP_USER = GFP_USER GFP_USER + __GFP_HIGHMEM = GFP_HIGHUSER GFP_USER + __GFP_HIGHMEM + __GFP_MOVABLE = GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE So just make GFP_HIGHUSER and GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE escalatedly defined to reflect this fact. It also makes the definition clear and texturally warn on any furture break-up of this escalated relastionship. Signed-off-by: NJianyu Zhan <jianyu.zhan@emc.com> Acked-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Acked-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NDavid Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录