[PATCH] r/o bind mounts: check mnt instead of superblock directly

If we depend on the inodes for writeability, we will not catch the r/o mounts
when implemented.

This patches uses __mnt_want_write().  It does not guarantee that the mount
will stay writeable after the check.  But, this is OK for one of the checks
because it is just for a printk().

The other two are probably unnecessary and duplicate existing checks in the
VFS.  This won't make them better checks than before, but it will make them
detect r/o mounts.
Acked-by: NAl Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NDave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

fs/nfs/dir.c

@@ -967,7 +967,8 @@ static int is_atomic_open(struct inode *dir, struct nameidata *nd)
 	if (nd->flags & LOOKUP_DIRECTORY)
 		return 0;
 	/* Are we trying to write to a read only partition? */
-	if (IS_RDONLY(dir) && (nd->intent.open.flags & (O_CREAT|O_TRUNC|FMODE_WRITE)))
+	if (__mnt_is_readonly(nd->path.mnt) &&
+	    (nd->intent.open.flags & (O_CREAT|O_TRUNC|FMODE_WRITE)))
 		return 0;
 	return 1;
 }

fs/nfsd/vfs.c

@@ -1912,7 +1912,7 @@ nfsd_permission(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_export *exp,
 		inode->i_mode,
 		IS_IMMUTABLE(inode)?	" immut" : "",
 		IS_APPEND(inode)?	" append" : "",
-		IS_RDONLY(inode)?	" ro" : "");
+		__mnt_is_readonly(exp->ex_path.mnt)?	" ro" : "");
 	dprintk("      owner %d/%d user %d/%d\n",
 		inode->i_uid, inode->i_gid, current->fsuid, current->fsgid);
 #endif
@@ -1923,7 +1923,8 @@ nfsd_permission(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_export *exp,
 	 */
 	if (!(acc & MAY_LOCAL_ACCESS))
 		if (acc & (MAY_WRITE | MAY_SATTR | MAY_TRUNC)) {
-			if (exp_rdonly(rqstp, exp) || IS_RDONLY(inode))
+			if (exp_rdonly(rqstp, exp) ||
+			    __mnt_is_readonly(exp->ex_path.mnt))
 				return nfserr_rofs;
 			if (/* (acc & MAY_WRITE) && */ IS_IMMUTABLE(inode))
 				return nfserr_perm;