提交 299e21ac 编写于 作者: J John Fastabend 提交者: Zheng Zengkai

bpf, sockmap: Fix sk->prot unhash op reset

stable inclusion
from stable-5.10.30
commit 00c01de1a994ed0689c7cb30049fdb5dbde348e2
bugzilla: 51791

--------------------------------

commit 1c84b331 upstream.

In '4da6a196' we fixed a potential unhash loop caused when
a TLS socket in a sockmap was removed from the sockmap. This
happened because the unhash operation on the TLS ctx continued
to point at the sockmap implementation of unhash even though the
psock has already been removed. The sockmap unhash handler when a
psock is removed does the following,

 void sock_map_unhash(struct sock *sk)
 {
	void (*saved_unhash)(struct sock *sk);
	struct sk_psock *psock;

	rcu_read_lock();
	psock = sk_psock(sk);
	if (unlikely(!psock)) {
		rcu_read_unlock();
		if (sk->sk_prot->unhash)
			sk->sk_prot->unhash(sk);
		return;
	}
        [...]
 }

The unlikely() case is there to handle the case where psock is detached
but the proto ops have not been updated yet. But, in the above case
with TLS and removed psock we never fixed sk_prot->unhash() and unhash()
points back to sock_map_unhash resulting in a loop. To fix this we added
this bit of code,

 static inline void sk_psock_restore_proto(struct sock *sk,
                                          struct sk_psock *psock)
 {
       sk->sk_prot->unhash = psock->saved_unhash;

This will set the sk_prot->unhash back to its saved value. This is the
correct callback for a TLS socket that has been removed from the sock_map.
Unfortunately, this also overwrites the unhash pointer for all psocks.
We effectively break sockmap unhash handling for any future socks.
Omitting the unhash operation will leave stale entries in the map if
a socket transition through unhash, but does not do close() op.

To fix set unhash correctly before calling into tls_update. This way the
TLS enabled socket will point to the saved unhash() handler.

Fixes: 4da6a196 ("bpf: Sockmap/tls, during free we may call tcp_bpf_unhash() in loop")
Reported-by: NCong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Reported-by: NLorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
Suggested-by: NCong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/161731441904.68884.15593917809745631972.stgit@john-XPS-13-9370Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NChen Jun <chenjun102@huawei.com>
Acked-by: N  Weilong Chen <chenweilong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NZheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>
上级 beaf0f4e
......@@ -349,8 +349,13 @@ static inline void sk_psock_update_proto(struct sock *sk,
static inline void sk_psock_restore_proto(struct sock *sk,
struct sk_psock *psock)
{
sk->sk_prot->unhash = psock->saved_unhash;
if (inet_csk_has_ulp(sk)) {
/* TLS does not have an unhash proto in SW cases, but we need
* to ensure we stop using the sock_map unhash routine because
* the associated psock is being removed. So use the original
* unhash handler.
*/
WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_prot->unhash, psock->saved_unhash);
tcp_update_ulp(sk, psock->sk_proto, psock->saved_write_space);
} else {
sk->sk_write_space = psock->saved_write_space;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册