提交 28a2a3f5 编写于 作者: A Alan Cox 提交者: Linus Torvalds

[PATCH] Fix 2.6.18-rc6 IDE breakage, add missing ident needed for current VIA boards

There are two changes here.  The first reverses the broken PCI_DEVICE
conversion back to the old format.  The second adds a missing PCI ID so
you can actually boot 2.6.18 on 2 month old VIA motherboards (right now
only 2.6.18-mm works).

CC'd to Jeff to check the PCI ident but its a) in several distro kernels
and b) in 2.6.18-mm [twice ??]
Signed-off-by: NAlan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
上级 38f5745c
......@@ -425,12 +425,12 @@ static int __devinit aec62xx_init_one(struct pci_dev *dev, const struct pci_devi
return d->init_setup(dev, d);
}
static const struct pci_device_id aec62xx_pci_tbl[] = {
{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_ARTOP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ARTOP_ATP850UF), 0 },
{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_ARTOP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ARTOP_ATP860), 1 },
{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_ARTOP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ARTOP_ATP860R), 2 },
{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_ARTOP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ARTOP_ATP865), 3 },
{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_ARTOP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ARTOP_ATP865R), 4 },
static struct pci_device_id aec62xx_pci_tbl[] = {
{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_ARTOP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ARTOP_ATP850UF, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0 },
{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_ARTOP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ARTOP_ATP860, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 1 },
{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_ARTOP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ARTOP_ATP860R, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 2 },
{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_ARTOP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ARTOP_ATP865, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 3 },
{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_ARTOP, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ARTOP_ATP865R, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 4 },
{ 0, },
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, aec62xx_pci_tbl);
......
......@@ -649,11 +649,11 @@ static int __devinit svwks_init_one(struct pci_dev *dev, const struct pci_device
}
static struct pci_device_id svwks_pci_tbl[] = {
{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_SERVERWORKS, PCI_DEVICE_ID_SERVERWORKS_OSB4IDE), 0},
{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_SERVERWORKS, PCI_DEVICE_ID_SERVERWORKS_CSB5IDE), 1},
{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_SERVERWORKS, PCI_DEVICE_ID_SERVERWORKS_CSB6IDE), 2},
{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_SERVERWORKS, PCI_DEVICE_ID_SERVERWORKS_CSB6IDE2), 3},
{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_SERVERWORKS, PCI_DEVICE_ID_SERVERWORKS_HT1000IDE), 4},
{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_SERVERWORKS, PCI_DEVICE_ID_SERVERWORKS_OSB4IDE, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0},
{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_SERVERWORKS, PCI_DEVICE_ID_SERVERWORKS_CSB5IDE, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 1},
{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_SERVERWORKS, PCI_DEVICE_ID_SERVERWORKS_CSB6IDE, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 2},
{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_SERVERWORKS, PCI_DEVICE_ID_SERVERWORKS_CSB6IDE2, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 3},
{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_SERVERWORKS, PCI_DEVICE_ID_SERVERWORKS_HT1000IDE, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 4},
{ 0, },
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, svwks_pci_tbl);
......
......@@ -1082,10 +1082,10 @@ static int __devinit siimage_init_one(struct pci_dev *dev, const struct pci_devi
}
static struct pci_device_id siimage_pci_tbl[] = {
{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_CMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_SII_680), 0},
{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_CMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_SII_680, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0},
#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDE_SATA
{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_CMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_SII_3112), 1},
{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_CMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_SII_1210SA), 2},
{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_CMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_SII_3112, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 1},
{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_CMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_SII_1210SA, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 2},
#endif
{ 0, },
};
......
......@@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ static void svia_scr_write (struct ata_port *ap, unsigned int sc_reg, u32 val);
static void vt6420_error_handler(struct ata_port *ap);
static const struct pci_device_id svia_pci_tbl[] = {
{ 0x1106, 0x0591, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, vt6420 },
{ 0x1106, 0x3149, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, vt6420 },
{ 0x1106, 0x3249, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, vt6421 },
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册