提交 2894d650 编写于 作者: S Sukadev Bhattiprolu 提交者: Linus Torvalds

pid namespaces: define and use task_active_pid_ns() wrapper

With multiple pid namespaces, a process is known by some pid_t in every
ancestor pid namespace.  Every time the process forks, the child process also
gets a pid_t in every ancestor pid namespace.

While a process is visible in >=1 pid namespaces, it can see pid_t's in only
one pid namespace.  We call this pid namespace it's "active pid namespace",
and it is always the youngest pid namespace in which the process is known.

This patch defines and uses a wrapper to find the active pid namespace of a
process.  The implementation of the wrapper will be changed in when support
for multiple pid namespaces are added.

Changelog:
	2.6.22-rc4-mm2-pidns1:
	- [Pavel Emelianov, Alexey Dobriyan] Back out the change to use
	  task_active_pid_ns() in child_reaper() since task->nsproxy
	  can be NULL during task exit (so child_reaper() continues to
	  use init_pid_ns).

	  to implement child_reaper() since init_pid_ns.child_reaper to
	  implement child_reaper() since tsk->nsproxy can be NULL during exit.

	2.6.21-rc6-mm1:
	- Rename task_pid_ns() to task_active_pid_ns() to reflect that a
	  process can have multiple pid namespaces.
Signed-off-by: NSukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@us.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NPavel Emelianov <xemul@openvz.org>
Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Cedric Le Goater <clg@fr.ibm.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Herbert Poetzel <herbert@13thfloor.at>
Cc: Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
上级 baf8f0f8
......@@ -776,7 +776,7 @@ static int de_thread(struct task_struct *tsk)
* so it is safe to do it under read_lock.
*/
if (unlikely(tsk->group_leader == child_reaper(tsk)))
tsk->nsproxy->pid_ns->child_reaper = tsk;
task_active_pid_ns(tsk)->child_reaper = tsk;
zap_other_threads(tsk);
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
......
......@@ -91,7 +91,8 @@ static int loadavg_read_proc(char *page, char **start, off_t off,
LOAD_INT(a), LOAD_FRAC(a),
LOAD_INT(b), LOAD_FRAC(b),
LOAD_INT(c), LOAD_FRAC(c),
nr_running(), nr_threads, current->nsproxy->pid_ns->last_pid);
nr_running(), nr_threads,
task_active_pid_ns(current)->last_pid);
return proc_calc_metrics(page, start, off, count, eof, len);
}
......
......@@ -39,6 +39,11 @@ static inline void put_pid_ns(struct pid_namespace *ns)
kref_put(&ns->kref, free_pid_ns);
}
static inline struct pid_namespace *task_active_pid_ns(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
return tsk->nsproxy->pid_ns;
}
static inline struct task_struct *child_reaper(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
return init_pid_ns.child_reaper;
......
......@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ static struct nsproxy *create_new_namespaces(unsigned long flags,
goto out_ipc;
}
new_nsp->pid_ns = copy_pid_ns(flags, tsk->nsproxy->pid_ns);
new_nsp->pid_ns = copy_pid_ns(flags, task_active_pid_ns(tsk));
if (IS_ERR(new_nsp->pid_ns)) {
err = PTR_ERR(new_nsp->pid_ns);
goto out_pid;
......
......@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ struct pid *alloc_pid(void)
int nr = -1;
struct pid_namespace *ns;
ns = current->nsproxy->pid_ns;
ns = task_active_pid_ns(current);
pid = kmem_cache_alloc(ns->pid_cachep, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!pid)
goto out;
......@@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ struct pid *find_ge_pid(int nr)
pid = find_pid(nr);
if (pid)
break;
nr = next_pidmap(current->nsproxy->pid_ns, nr);
nr = next_pidmap(task_active_pid_ns(current), nr);
} while (nr > 0);
return pid;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册