提交 24512228 编写于 作者: M Mel Gorman 提交者: Linus Torvalds

mm: do not boost watermarks to avoid fragmentation for the DISCONTIG memory model

Mikulas Patocka reported that commit 1c30844d ("mm: reclaim small
amounts of memory when an external fragmentation event occurs") "broke"
memory management on parisc.

The machine is not NUMA but the DISCONTIG model creates three pgdats
even though it's a UMA machine for the following ranges

        0) Start 0x0000000000000000 End 0x000000003fffffff Size   1024 MB
        1) Start 0x0000000100000000 End 0x00000001bfdfffff Size   3070 MB
        2) Start 0x0000004040000000 End 0x00000040ffffffff Size   3072 MB

Mikulas reported:

	With the patch 1c30844d, the kernel will incorrectly reclaim the
	first zone when it fills up, ignoring the fact that there are two
	completely free zones. Basiscally, it limits cache size to 1GiB.

	For example, if I run:
	# dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/null bs=1M count=2048

	- with the proper kernel, there should be "Buffers - 2GiB"
	when this command finishes. With the patch 1c30844d, buffers
	will consume just 1GiB or slightly more, because the kernel was
	incorrectly reclaiming them.

The page allocator and reclaim makes assumptions that pgdats really
represent NUMA nodes and zones represent ranges and makes decisions on
that basis.  Watermark boosting for small pgdats leads to unexpected
results even though this would have behaved reasonably on SPARSEMEM.

DISCONTIG is essentially deprecated and even parisc plans to move to
SPARSEMEM so there is no need to be fancy, this patch simply disables
watermark boosting by default on DISCONTIGMEM.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190419094335.GJ18914@techsingularity.net
Fixes: 1c30844d ("mm: reclaim small amounts of memory when an external fragmentation event occurs")
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Reported-by: NMikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Tested-by: NMikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
上级 e7898035
......@@ -866,14 +866,14 @@ The intent is that compaction has less work to do in the future and to
increase the success rate of future high-order allocations such as SLUB
allocations, THP and hugetlbfs pages.
To make it sensible with respect to the watermark_scale_factor parameter,
the unit is in fractions of 10,000. The default value of 15,000 means
that up to 150% of the high watermark will be reclaimed in the event of
a pageblock being mixed due to fragmentation. The level of reclaim is
determined by the number of fragmentation events that occurred in the
recent past. If this value is smaller than a pageblock then a pageblocks
worth of pages will be reclaimed (e.g. 2MB on 64-bit x86). A boost factor
of 0 will disable the feature.
To make it sensible with respect to the watermark_scale_factor
parameter, the unit is in fractions of 10,000. The default value of
15,000 on !DISCONTIGMEM configurations means that up to 150% of the high
watermark will be reclaimed in the event of a pageblock being mixed due
to fragmentation. The level of reclaim is determined by the number of
fragmentation events that occurred in the recent past. If this value is
smaller than a pageblock then a pageblocks worth of pages will be reclaimed
(e.g. 2MB on 64-bit x86). A boost factor of 0 will disable the feature.
=============================================================
......
......@@ -266,7 +266,20 @@ compound_page_dtor * const compound_page_dtors[] = {
int min_free_kbytes = 1024;
int user_min_free_kbytes = -1;
#ifdef CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM
/*
* DiscontigMem defines memory ranges as separate pg_data_t even if the ranges
* are not on separate NUMA nodes. Functionally this works but with
* watermark_boost_factor, it can reclaim prematurely as the ranges can be
* quite small. By default, do not boost watermarks on discontigmem as in
* many cases very high-order allocations like THP are likely to be
* unsupported and the premature reclaim offsets the advantage of long-term
* fragmentation avoidance.
*/
int watermark_boost_factor __read_mostly;
#else
int watermark_boost_factor __read_mostly = 15000;
#endif
int watermark_scale_factor = 10;
static unsigned long nr_kernel_pages __initdata;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册