提交 23397883 编写于 作者: D Dan Williams

md: fix merge error

The original STRIPE_OP_IO removal patch had the following hunk:

-               for (i = conf->raid_disks; i--; ) {
+               for (i = conf->raid_disks; i--; )
                        set_bit(R5_Wantwrite, &sh->dev[i].flags);
-                       if (!test_and_set_bit(STRIPE_OP_IO, &sh->ops.pending))
-                               sh->ops.count++;
-               }

However it appears the hunk became broken after merging:
-               for (i = conf->raid_disks; i--; ) {
+               for (i = conf->raid_disks; i--; )
                        set_bit(R5_Wantwrite, &sh->dev[i].flags);
                        set_bit(R5_LOCKED, &dev->flags);
                        s.locked++;
-                       if (!test_and_set_bit(STRIPE_OP_IO, &sh->ops.pending))
-                               sh->ops.count++;
-               }
Signed-off-by: NDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
上级 c9f21aaf
......@@ -2717,10 +2717,11 @@ static void handle_stripe5(struct stripe_head *sh)
if (sh->reconstruct_state == reconstruct_state_result) {
sh->reconstruct_state = reconstruct_state_idle;
clear_bit(STRIPE_EXPANDING, &sh->state);
for (i = conf->raid_disks; i--; )
for (i = conf->raid_disks; i--; ) {
set_bit(R5_Wantwrite, &sh->dev[i].flags);
set_bit(R5_LOCKED, &dev->flags);
set_bit(R5_LOCKED, &sh->dev[i].flags);
s.locked++;
}
}
if (s.expanded && test_bit(STRIPE_EXPANDING, &sh->state) &&
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册