drm/i915: clear up wedged transitions
We have two important transitions of the wedged state in the current code: - 0 -> 1: This means a hang has been detected, and signals to everyone that they please get of any locks, so that the reset work item can do its job. - 1 -> 0: The reset handler has completed. Now the last transition mixes up two states: "Reset completed and successful" and "Reset failed". To distinguish these two we do some tricks with the reset completion, but I simply could not convince myself that this doesn't race under odd circumstances. Hence split this up, and add a new terminal state indicating that the hw is gone for good. Also add explicit #defines for both states, update comments. v2: Split out the reset handling bugfix for the throttle ioctl. v3: s/tmp/wedged/ sugested by Chris Wilson. Also fixup up a rebase error which prevented this patch from actually compiling. v4: To unify the wedged state with the reset counter, keep the reset-in-progress state just as a flag. The terminally-wedged state is now denoted with a big number. v5: Add a comment to the reset_counter special values explaining that WEDGED & RESET_IN_PROGRESS needs to be true for the code to be correct. v6: Fixup logic errors introduced with the wedged+reset_counter unification. Since WEDGED implies reset-in-progress (in a way we're terminally stuck in the dead-but-reset-not-completed state), we need ensure that we check for this everywhere. The specific bug was in wait_for_error, which would simply have timed out. v7: Extract an inline i915_reset_in_progress helper to make the code more readable. Also annote the reset-in-progress case with an unlikely, to help the compiler optimize the fastpath. Do the same for the terminally wedged case with i915_terminally_wedged. Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Signed-Off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录