xfs: Don't use unwritten extents for DAX
DAX has a page fault serialisation problem with block allocation. Because it allows concurrent page faults and does not have a page lock to serialise faults to the same page, it can get two concurrent faults to the page that race. When two read faults race, this isn't a huge problem as the data underlying the page is not changing and so "detect and drop" works just fine. The issues are to do with write faults. When two write faults occur, we serialise block allocation in get_blocks() so only one faul will allocate the extent. It will, however, be marked as an unwritten extent, and that is where the problem lies - the DAX fault code cannot differentiate between a block that was just allocated and a block that was preallocated and needs zeroing. The result is that both write faults end up zeroing the block and attempting to convert it back to written. The problem is that the first fault can zero and convert before the second fault starts zeroing, resulting in the zeroing for the second fault overwriting the data that the first fault wrote with zeros. The second fault then attempts to convert the unwritten extent, which is then a no-op because it's already written. Data loss occurs as a result of this race. Because there is no sane locking construct in the page fault code that we can use for serialisation across the page faults, we need to ensure block allocation and zeroing occurs atomically in the filesystem. This means we can still take concurrent page faults and the only time they will serialise is in the filesystem mapping/allocation callback. The page fault code will always see written, initialised extents, so we will be able to remove the unwritten extent handling from the DAX code when all filesystems are converted. Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NBrian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录